Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33114073›Full record

ArticleNutrients2020

Comparative Genome Analysis of

Rebbeca M Duar, Giorgio Casaburi, Ryan D Mitchell, Lindsey N C Scofield, Camila A Ortega Ramirez, Daniela Barile, Bethany M Henrick, Steven A Frese

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrients, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 68 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Global biogeography ofGut microbes · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Neonatal faecal abundance ofGut microbiome (Cambridge, England) · 2026
    Article
  8. 3'-Sialyllactose andGut microbes · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Efficacy and Safety ofFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  19. Gut microbes · 2023
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Rebbeca M DuarEvolve BioSystems, Inc., Davis, CA 95618, USA.
Giorgio CasaburiEvolve BioSystems, Inc., Davis, CA 95618, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5980-8704
Ryan D MitchellEvolve BioSystems, Inc., Davis, CA 95618, USA.
Lindsey N C ScofieldEvolve BioSystems, Inc., Davis, CA 95618, USA.
Camila A Ortega RamirezEvolve BioSystems, Inc., Davis, CA 95618, USA.
Daniela BarileFoods for Health Institute, University of California at Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3889-1596
Bethany M HenrickEvolve BioSystems, Inc., Davis, CA 95618, USA.
Steven A FreseEvolve BioSystems, Inc., Davis, CA 95618, USA.
University of Nebraska–Lincoln · USUniversity of California, Davis · US

Funding

Acquisition of Covaris E220 and Sciclone G3 systems for high throughput sequencinS10OD010786 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI COMAI, LUCA · 2012 to 2012
$311k
NIH HHS S10 OD010786
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dysbiosis is associated with acute and long-term consequences for neonates. Probiotics can be effective in limiting the growth of bacteria associated with dysbiosis and promoting the healthy development of the infant microbiome. Given its adaptation to the infant gut, and promising data from animal and

Indexed as

Bifidobacterium longum subspecies infantisComparative Genomic HybridizationDysbiosisGastrointestinal MicrobiomeGenotypeHumansInfant, NewbornMilk, HumanOligosaccharidesProbioticsOligosaccharidesdysbiosisgut microbiomeHMONECprobiotics

Identifiers

PMID33114073
PMCPMC7690671
OpenAlexW3094521183

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.