Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33114007›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2020

A Novel Fetal Movement Simulator for the Performance Evaluation of Vibration Sensors for Wearable Fetal Movement Monitors.

Abhishek Kumar Ghosh, Sonny F Burniston, Daniel Krentzel, Abhishek Roy, Adil Shoaib Sheikh, Talha Siddiq, Paula Mai Phuong Trinh, Marta Mambrilla Velazquez, Hei-Ting Vielle, Niamh C Nowlan and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Smart Sensors for Healthcare and Medical Applications.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Abhishek Kumar GhoshDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7846-0793
Sonny F BurnistonDepartment of Bioengineering, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK.
Daniel KrentzelDepartment of Bioengineering, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK.
Abhishek RoyDepartment of Bioengineering, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK.
Adil Shoaib SheikhDepartment of Bioengineering, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4274-4951
Talha SiddiqDepartment of Bioengineering, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3145-2088
Paula Mai Phuong TrinhDepartment of Bioengineering, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK.
Marta Mambrilla VelazquezDepartment of Bioengineering, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK.
Hei-Ting VielleDepartment of Bioengineering, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK.
Niamh C NowlanDepartment of Bioengineering, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK.
Ravi VaidyanathanDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK.
Imperial College London · GB

Funding

Commonwealth Scholarship Commission BDCS-2018-46UK-India Education and Research Initiative (UKIERI) DST-UKIERI-2016-17-0103
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fetal movements (FM) are an important factor in the assessment of fetal health. However, there is currently no reliable way to monitor FM outside clinical environs. While extensive research has been carried out using accelerometer-based systems to monitor FM, the desired accuracy of detection is yet to be achieved. A major challenge has been the difficulty of testing and calibrating sensors at the pre-clinical stage. Little is known about fetal movement features, and clinical trials involving pregnant women can be expensive and ethically stringent. To address these issues, we introduce a novel FM simulator, which can be used to test responses of sensor arrays in a laboratory environment. The design uses a silicon-based membrane with material properties similar to that of a gravid abdomen to mimic the vibrations due to fetal kicks. The simulator incorporates mechanisms to pre-stretch the membrane and to produce kicks similar to that of a fetus. As a case study, we present results from a comparative study of an acoustic sensor, an accelerometer, and a piezoelectric diaphragm as candidate vibration sensors for a wearable FM monitor. We find that the acoustic sensor and the piezoelectric diaphragm are better equipped than the accelerometer to determine durations, intensities, and locations of kicks, as they have a significantly greater response to changes in these conditions than the accelerometer. Additionally, we demonstrate that the acoustic sensor and the piezoelectric diaphragm can detect weaker fetal movements (threshold wall displacements are less than 0.5 mm) compared to the accelerometer (threshold wall displacement is 1.5 mm) with a trade-off of higher power signal artefacts. Finally, we find that the piezoelectric diaphragm produces better signal-to-noise ratios compared to the other two sensors in most of the cases, making it a promising new candidate sensor for wearable FM monitors. We believe that the FM simulator represents a key development towards enabling the eventual translation of wearable FM monitoring garments.

Indexed as

Fetal MovementWearable Electronic DevicesFemaleFetal MonitoringHumansMovementPregnancyVibrationaccelerometeracoustic sensorfetal movement monitorfetal movement simulatormaternal abdomen modelpiezoelectric diaphragm

Identifiers

PMID33114007
PMCPMC7660296
OpenAlexW3093621576

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.