Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33113957›Full record

ArticleJournal of personalized medicine2020

False Alarms in Consumer Genomics Add to Public Fear and Potential Health Care Burden.

Xiaoming Liu, Deborah Cragun, Jinyong Pang, Swamy R Adapa, Renee Fonseca, Rays H Y Jiang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of personalized medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Xiaoming LiuCollege of Public Health, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL 33612, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8285-5528
Deborah CragunCollege of Public Health, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL 33612, USA.
Jinyong PangCollege of Public Health, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL 33612, USA.
Swamy R AdapaCollege of Public Health, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL 33612, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3313-2782
Renee FonsecaMorsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL 33612, USA.
Rays H Y JiangCollege of Public Health, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL 33612, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8982-4169

Funding

Extend and improve the functional annotation tools dbNSFP and WGSAR03HG011075 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA · PI LIU, XIAOMING · 2020 to 2021
$150k
NHGRI NIH HHS 1R03HG011075NHGRI NIH HHS R03 HG011075
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We have entered an era of direct-to-consumer (DTC) genomics. Patients have relayed many success stories of DTC genomics about finding causal mutations of genetic diseases before showing any symptoms and taking precautions. However, consumers may also take unnecessary medical actions based on false alarms of "pathogenic alleles". The severity of this problem is not well known. Using publicly available data, we compared DTC microarray genotyping data with deep-sequencing data of 5 individuals and manually checked each inconsistently reported single nucleotide variants (SNVs). We estimated that, on average, a person would have ~5 "pathogenic" alleles reported due to wrongly reported genotypes if using a 23andMe genotyping microarray. We also found that the number of wrongly classified "pathogenic" alleles per person is at least as significant as those due to wrongly reported genotypes. We show that the scale of the false alarm problem could be large enough that the medical costs will become a burden to public health.

Indexed as

direct to consumer genomicsfalse alarmgenotyping errormicroarrayvariant classification error

Identifiers

PMID33113957
PMCPMC7712761

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.