Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33113933›Full record

ReviewBiomolecules2020

Archaeal DNA Repair Mechanisms.

Craig J Marshall, Thomas J Santangelo

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biomolecules, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Telomerase mRNA therapy protects human skin against radiation-induced DNA damage.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. CRISPR/Cas12a toolbox for genome editing inFrontiers in microbiology · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Craig J MarshallDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA.
Thomas J SantangeloDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4559-3244

Funding

Mechanisms of Archaeal Transcription Termination - Administrative SupplementR01GM100329 · NIGMS · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI SANTANGELO, THOMAS JAMES · 2012 to 2021
$2.5M
Regulation of Archaeal TranscriptionR35GM143963 · NIGMS · COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI Thomas James Santangelo · 2022 to 2026
$1.8M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM100329NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM100329NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM143963
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Archaea often thrive in environmental extremes, enduring levels of heat, pressure, salinity, pH, and radiation that prove intolerable to most life. Many environmental extremes raise the propensity for DNA damaging events and thus, impact DNA stability, placing greater reliance on molecular mechanisms that recognize DNA damage and initiate accurate repair. Archaea can presumably prosper in harsh and DNA-damaging environments in part due to robust DNA repair pathways but surprisingly, no DNA repair pathways unique to Archaea have been described. Here, we review the most recent advances in our understanding of archaeal DNA repair. We summarize DNA damage types and their consequences, their recognition by host enzymes, and how the collective activities of many DNA repair pathways maintain archaeal genomic integrity.

Indexed as

ArchaeaDNA, ArchaealDNA DamageDNA RepairDNA, ArchaealarchaeaDNA damageDNA metabolismDNA modificationsDNA repairdouble-strand breaksgenomic integrity

Identifiers

PMID33113933
PMCPMC7690668

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.