ArticlePolymers2020
Quantitative Investigation of the Process Parameters of Electrohydrodynamic Direct-Writing and Their Effects on Fiber Surface Roughness and Cell Adhesion.
Article in Polymers, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Control of Meniscus Formation Using an Electrohydrodynamics Module in Roll-to-Roll Systems for the Stable Coating of Functional Layers.Polymers · 2024Article
- Additive Manufacturing of Biodegradable Hemp-Reinforced Polybutylene Succinate (PBS) and Its Mechanical Characterization.Polymers · 2023Article
- 3D printing of bio-instructive materials: Toward directing the cell.Bioactive materials · 2023Article
- Development and Mechanical Characterization of Short Curauá Fiber-Reinforced PLA Composites Made via Fused Deposition Modeling.Polymers · 2022Article
- Thermal Effects on Mechanical Strength of Additive Manufactured CFRP Composites at Stable and Cyclic Temperature.Polymers · 2022Article
- High Precision 3D Printing for Micro to Nano Scale Biomedical and Electronic Devices.Micromachines · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Electrohydrodynamic (EHD) direct-writing has been widely used to fabricate micro/nanofibers that can serve as a building block in tissue engineering scaffolds. However, the application of EHD direct-writing in tissue engineering is limited by the lack of fundamental knowledge in the correlations among the process parameters, the fiber surface roughness, and the cell adhesion performance. Without a standardized experimental setting and the quantitative database, inconsistent results have been reported. Here, we quantitatively investigate the process-structure-property relationships as the first step towards a better understanding of the EHD direct-writing technology for tissue engineering. Polycaprolactone (PCL) solution is used as a model ink material, and human mesenchymal stem cells (hMSCs) are used to study cell adhesion on PCL fibers. We investigate the different jetting modes defined by the applied voltage, the feed rate, and the nozzle-collector distance. The quantitative effects of process parameters on the fiber surface roughness and the cell adhesion performance are experimentally determined. The quantitative process-structure-property relationships revealed in this study provide guidelines for controlling the surface roughness and the cell adhesion performance of EHD direct-written fibers. This study will facilitate the application of EHD direct-writing in tissue engineering.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.