Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33113753›Full record

ReviewJournal of hazardous materials2021

Remediation of poly- and perfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) contaminated soils - To mobilize or to immobilize or to degrade?

Nanthi Bolan, Binoy Sarkar, Yubo Yan, Qiao Li, Hasintha Wijesekara, Kurunthachalam Kannan, Daniel C W Tsang, Marina Schauerte, Julian Bosch, Hendrik Noll and 11 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of hazardous materials, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Comparing PFAS analysis in batch leaching and column leaching tests.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Nanthi BolanThe Global Centre for Environmental Remediation, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia. Electronic address: nanthi.bolan@newcastle.edu.au.
Binoy SarkarLancaster Environment Centre, Lancaster University, Lancaster, LA1 4YQ, United Kingdom.
Yubo YanSchool of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Huaiyin Normal University, Huaian 223300, People's Republic of China.
Qiao LiJiangsu Key Laboratory of Chemical Pollution Control and Resources Reuse, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, Nanjing 210094, People's Republic of China.
Hasintha WijesekaraDepartment of Natural Resources, Faculty of Applied Sciences, Sabaragamuwa University of Sri Lanka, Belihuloya, 70140, Sri Lanka.
Kurunthachalam KannanDepartment of Pediatrics, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York 10016, USA.
Daniel C W TsangDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong.
Marina SchauerteSoil- and Groundwater-Management, Institute of Soil Engineering, Waste- and Water-Management, Faculty of Architecture und Civil Engineering, University of Wuppertal, Germany.
Julian BoschINTRAPORE GmbH, Advanced In Situ Groundwater Remediation, Essen, Leipzig, Mailand, Katernberger Str. 107, 45327 Essen, Germany.
Hendrik NollINTRAPORE GmbH, Advanced In Situ Groundwater Remediation, Essen, Leipzig, Mailand, Katernberger Str. 107, 45327 Essen, Germany.
Yong Sik OkKorea Biochar Research Center, APRU Sustainable Waste Management, Division of Environmental Science and Ecological Engineering, Korea University, Seoul, South Korea.
Kirk ScheckelUnited States Environmental Protection Agency, Center for Environmental Solutions & Emergency Response, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Jurate KumpieneWaste Science and Technology, Luleå University of Technology, Luleå, Sweden.
Kapish GobindlalCentre for Green Chemical Science, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Melanie KahSchool of Environment, The University of Auckland, 23 Symonds Street, Auckland 1010, New Zealand.
Jonathan SperryCentre for Green Chemical Science, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
M B KirkhamDepartment of Agronomy, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas 66506 USA.
Hailong WangSchool of Environmental and Chemical Engineering, Foshan University, Foshan, Guangdong 528000, People's Republic of China.
Yiu Fai TsangDepartment of Science and Environmental Studies, The Education University of Hong Kong, Tai Po, New Territories 999077, Hong Kong.
Deyi HouSchool of Environment, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, People's Republic of China.
Jörg RinklebeSoil- and Groundwater-Management, Institute of Soil Engineering, Waste- and Water-Management, Faculty of Architecture und Civil Engineering, University of Wuppertal, Germany; Department of Environment, Energy and Geoinformatics, Sejong University, Seoul 05006, South Korea.

Funding

Intramural EPA EPA999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Poly- and perfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) are synthetic chemicals, which are introduced to the environment through anthropogenic activities. Aqueous film forming foam used in firefighting, wastewater effluent, landfill leachate, and biosolids are major sources of PFAS input to soil and groundwater. Remediation of PFAS contaminated solid and aqueous media is challenging, which is attributed to the chemical and thermal stability of PFAS and the complexity of PFAS mixtures. In this review, remediation of PFAS contaminated soils through manipulation of their bioavailability and destruction is presented. While the mobilizing amendments (e.g., surfactants) enhance the mobility and bioavailability of PFAS, the immobilizing amendments (e.g., activated carbon) decrease their bioavailability and mobility. Mobilizing amendments can be applied to facilitate the removal of PFAS though soil washing, phytoremediation, and complete destruction through thermal and chemical redox reactions. Immobilizing amendments are likely to reduce the transfer of PFAS to food chain through plant and biota (e.g., earthworm) uptake, and leaching to potable water sources. Future studies should focus on quantifying the potential leaching of the mobilized PFAS in the absence of removal by plant and biota uptake or soil washing, and regular monitoring of the long-term stability of the immobilized PFAS.

Indexed as

FluorocarbonsGroundwaterSoil PollutantsWater Pollutants, ChemicalSoilFluorocarbonsSoilSoil PollutantsWater Pollutants, ChemicalAqueous firefighting foamBiosolidsMobilization and immobilizationPFASSoil remediation

Identifiers

PMID33113753
PMCPMC8025151

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.