Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33113389›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in structural biology2021

Anatomy of the fungal microtubule organizing center, the spindle pole body.

Sue L Jaspersen

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in structural biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Moonlighting at the Poles: Non-Canonical Functions of Centrosomes.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Distribution of γ-tubulin ring complex at themicroPublication biology · 2021
    Article
  16. A mutation in budding yeastmicroPublication biology · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sue L JaspersenStowers Institute for Medical Research, Kansas City, MO 64110, United States; Department of Molecular and Integrative Physiology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS 66160, United States. Electronic address: slj@stowers.org.
Stowers Institute for Medical Research · US

Funding

Assembly and Regulation of Yeast Spindle PolesR01GM121443 · NIGMS · STOWERS INSTITUTE FOR MEDICAL RESEARCH · PI GERTON, JENNIFER L · 2017 to 2020
$1.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM121443
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The fungal kingdom is large and diverse, representing extremes of ecology, life cycles and morphology. At a cellular level, the diversity among fungi is particularly apparent at the spindle pole body (SPB). This nuclear envelope embedded structure, which is essential for microtubule nucleation, shows dramatically different morphologies between different fungi. However, despite phenotypic diversity, many SPB components are conserved, suggesting commonalities in structure, function and duplication. Here, I review the organization of the most well-studied SPBs and describe how advances in genomics, genetics and cell biology have accelerated knowledge of SPB architecture in other fungi, providing insights into microtubule nucleation and other processes conserved across eukaryotes.

Indexed as

Fungal ProteinsSpindle Pole BodiesFungiMicrotubule-Organizing CenterMicrotubulesNuclear EnvelopeSpindle ApparatusFungal Proteins

Identifiers

PMID33113389
PMCPMC7965227
OpenAlexW3093633104

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.