ArticleJournal of clinical nursing2021
Designing paper-based records to improve the quality of nursing documentation in hospitals: A scoping review.
Article in Journal of clinical nursing, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Summary of the best evidence for the prevention of deep vein thrombosis in patients with intracerebral hemorrhage.Frontiers in neurologyPooled it
- Quality of nursing documentation and clinical reasoning competence: The mediating role of interprofessional collaboration.SAGE open medicine · 2026Article
- Article
- Article
- Capturing Home Care Information Management and Communication Processes Among Caregivers of Older Adults: Qualitative Study to Inform Technology Design.JMIR formative research · 2024Article
- A quality improvement initiative to reduce the time to initial maternal visit in the neonatal intensive care unit.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2024Article
- Scoping review of interventions to improve continuity of postdischarge care for newborns in LMICs.BMJ global health · 2024Article
- Standardized Comparison of Voice-Based Information and Documentation Systems to Established Systems in Intensive Care: Crossover Study.JMIR medical informatics · 2023Article
- Diagnostic accuracy study of the VALENF instrument in hospitalization units for adults: a study protocol.BMC nursing · 2023Article
- Improving Nursing Assessment in Adult Hospitalization Units: A Secondary Analysis.Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy) · 2023Article
- Developing and validating an integrated instrument for nursing assessments in adult hospitalization units: Study protocol.Nursing open · 2023Article
- 'Paper care not patient care': Nurse and patient experiences of comprehensive risk assessment and care plan documentation in hospital.Journal of clinical nursing · 2023Article
- Evaluating the documentation of vital signs following implementation of a new comprehensive newborn monitoring chart in 19 hospitals in Kenya: A time series analysis.PLOS global public health · 2023Article
- Development and Validation of a Meta-Instrument for Nursing Assessment in Adult Hospitalization Units (VALENF Instrument) (Part I).International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Clinical Coders' Perspectives on Pressure Injury Coding in Acute Care Services in Victoria, Australia.Frontiers in public health · 2022Article
- Using a human-centred design approach to develop a comprehensive newborn monitoring chart for inpatient care in Kenya.BMC health services research · 2021Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundInpatient nursing documentation facilitates multi-disciplinary team care and tracking of patient progress. In both high- and low- and middle-income settings, it is largely paper-based and may be used as a template for electronic medical records. However, there is limited evidence on how they have been developed.
objectiveTo synthesise evidence on how paper-based nursing records have been developed and implemented in inpatient settings to support documentation of nursing care.
designA scoping review guided by the Arksey and O'Malley framework and reported using PRISMA-ScR guidelines. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: We included studies that described the process of designing paper-based inpatient records and excluded those focussing on electronic records. Included studies were published in English up to October 2019. SOURCES OF EVIDENCE: PubMed, CINAHL, Web of Science and Cochrane supplemented by free-text searches on Google Scholar and snowballing the reference sections of included papers.
results12 studies met the eligibility criteria. We extracted data on study characteristics, the development process and outcomes related to documentation of inpatient care. Studies reviewed followed a process of problem identification, literature review, chart (re)design, piloting, implementation and evaluation but varied in their execution of each step. All studies except one reported a positive change in inpatient documentation or the adoption of charts amid various challenges.
conclusionsThe approaches used seemed to work for each of the studies but could be strengthened by following a systematic process. Human-centred Design provides a clear process that prioritises the healthcare professional's needs and their context to deliver a usable product. Problems with the chart could be addressed during the design phase rather than during implementation, thereby promoting chart ownership and uptake since users are involved throughout the design. This will translate to better documentation of inpatient care thus facilitating better patient tracking, improved team communication and better patient outcomes. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Paper-based charts should be designed in a systematic and clear process that considers patient's and healthcare professional's needs contributing to improved uptake of charts and therefore better documentation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.