Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33113154›Full record

ArticleHistopathology2021

Metaplastic carcinomas of the breast without evidence of epithelial differentiation: a diagnostic approach for management.

Emad A Rakha, Cecily M Quinn, Maria Pia Foschini, Monica Muñoz Martin, David J Dabbs, Sunil Lakhani, Zsuzsanna Varga, Sarah E Pinder, Fernando C Schmitt, Jorge S Reis-Filho and 4 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Histopathology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Differential diagnosis of primary mesenchymal neoplasms of the breast.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2025
    Article
  7. Breast Cancer Histopathology in the Age of Molecular Oncology.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine · 2024
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Molecular pathology in breast disease: diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic tools.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 11 institutions in 8 countries.

Emad A RakhaDepartment of Histopathology, The University of Nottingham and the Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham City Hospital, Nottingham, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5009-5525
Cecily M QuinnDepartment of Histopathology, St Vincent's University Hospital, University College, Dublin, Ireland.
Maria Pia FoschiniDepartment of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, Section of Anatomic Pathology at Bellaria Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Monica Muñoz MartinDepartment of Histopathology, The University of Nottingham and the Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham City Hospital, Nottingham, UK.
David J DabbsJohn A. Burns University of Hawaii Cancer Center, Honolulu, HI, USA.
Sunil LakhaniFaculty of Medicine and Pathology Queensland, University of Queensland Centre for Clinical Research, Brisbane, Australia.
Zsuzsanna VargaInstitute of Pathology and Molecular Pathology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2855-983X
Sarah E PinderDivision of Cancer Studies, King's College London, Guy's Hospital, London, UK.
Fernando C SchmittInstitute of Molecular Pathology and Immunology (IPATIMUP) and Medical Faculty, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Jorge S Reis-FilhoDepartment of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Centre, New York, NY, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2969-3173
Stephen B FoxPathology Department, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Ian O EllisDepartment of Histopathology, The University of Nottingham and the Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham City Hospital, Nottingham, UK.
Puay-Hoon TanDepartment of Pathology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Raluca MihaiDepartment of Histopathology, The University of Nottingham and the Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham City Hospital, Nottingham, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9169-5941
Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust · GBGuy's Hospital · GBMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USPeter MacCallum Cancer Centre · AUSingapore General Hospital · SGThe University of Queensland · AUUniversidade do Porto · PTUniversity College Dublin · IEUniversity Hospital of Zurich · CHUniversity of Bologna · ITUniversity of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Breast Cancer Research FoundationNational Institutes of Health/National Cancer Institute P30CA008748NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NIH HHS
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsAlthough rare, malignant sarcomatoid breast tumours without evidence of epithelial differentiation comprise a diagnostic challenge with management implications. Earlier studies have generally considered these to be primary breast sarcomas; however, supporting evidence is lacking and management remains variable. This study aimed to provide an evidence-based approach to improve the consistency of diagnosis and management for such cases. METHODS AND

resultsA large series (n = 140) of metaplastic breast carcinoma (MBC) diagnosed in Nottingham over 18 years was analysed. Only cases with available data on immunohistochemical expression of cytokeratins (CKs) were included. The prevalence and pattern of expression for various CKs were assessed and details of tumours negative for CKs were collected. A diagnostic approach based on our experience is provided. Forty-seven cases (34%) showed foci of conventional type invasive breast carcinoma or ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), while 93 cases (66%) were diagnosed as MBC based on morphology and/or CK expression. Ninety-seven cases (69%) were negative for one or more CKs, with 18 cases (13%) negative for five or more CKs. Eight cases (6%) lacked expression of all CKs tested. Further examination showed evidence of carcinomatous nature in five cases, and three were diagnosed as MBC following extensive diagnostic work-up and based on our experience.

conclusionThis study suggests that MBC represents a spectrum of neoplasms, with some lacking CK expression. Sarcomatoid neoplasms of the breast lacking evidence of carcinomatous morphology and CK expression may represent an extreme end of differentiation that can be considered as carcinomas rather than sarcomas for management purposes (following extensive work-up).

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsAdultBiomarkers, TumorBreastCarcinoma, Intraductal, NoninfiltratingCohort StudiesDiagnosis, DifferentialEpitheliumFemaleHumansImmunohistochemistryKeratinsMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesSarcomaBiomarkers, TumorKeratinsBreast metaplastic carcinomaCKs negativediagnosis

Identifiers

PMID33113154
PMCPMC8492009
OpenAlexW3095446234

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.