ArticleThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2021
Detection of coronary calcifications with dual energy chest X-rays: clinical evaluation.
Article in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluation of algorithmic requirements for clinical application of material decomposition using a multi-layer flat panel detector.Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2025Article
- The Complex Mechanisms and the Potential Effects of Statins on Vascular Calcification: A Narrative Review.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Review
- Estimating the accuracy of dual energy chest radiography for coronary calcium detection with lateral or anteroposterior orientations.Medical physics · 2022Article
- Progress and Research Priorities in Imaging Genomics for Heart and Lung Disease: Summary of an NHLBI Workshop.Circulation. Cardiovascular imaging · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Our goal is to assess the ability of physicians to detect coronary calcifications in dual energy chest X-rays processed by a previously developed advanced algorithm. Because the chest X-ray is the most common imaging procedure, because the presence of coronary calcium provides proof of coronary artery disease, and because adherence to therapy can improve health, successful detection could positively impact healthcare for a large number of patients. Both dual energy chest and corroborative CT calcium score images were acquired. Dual energy images were processed with the advanced techniques, including sliding organ registration, so as to enhance coronary calcifications in two-shot dual energy acquisitions. We performed ROC to determine physicians' ability to detect coronary calcifications. Since detection might be easier with heavier calcifications, we used various Agatston score cut-points for determining cases actually positive with calcification in the ROC analysis. In many cases, coronary calcifications were made more visible with the advanced processing as compared to conventional processing. At an Agatston cut-point of 300, coronary calcifications were detected with AUC = 0.85. There were marginal effects on detection performance found with increased X-ray exposure, nearby Agatston cut-point values, and coronary artery territory. Coronary calcifications can be detected in dual energy chest X-rays. The ability to detect disease compares very favorably to other accepted screening methods (e.g., X-ray mammography). As the chest X-ray is an already ordered procedure, there is an opportunity to detect a very large number of persons with coronary artery disease at zero or low cost.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.