Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33113034›Full record

ArticleAnimal cognition2021

Dog cognitive development: a longitudinal study across the first 2 years of life.

Emily E Bray, Margaret E Gruen, Gitanjali E Gnanadesikan, Daniel J Horschler, Kerinne M Levy, Brenda S Kennedy, Brian A Hare, Evan L MacLean

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animal cognition, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 73 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Inhibitory control tests in non-human animals: validity, reliability, and perspectives.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Emily E BrayArizona Canine Cognition Center, School of Anthropology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, 85719, USA. ebray@email.arizona.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3230-0636
Margaret E GruenDepartment of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, 27607, USA.
Gitanjali E GnanadesikanArizona Canine Cognition Center, School of Anthropology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, 85719, USA.
Daniel J HorschlerArizona Canine Cognition Center, School of Anthropology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, 85719, USA.
Kerinne M LevyCanine Companions for Independence, National Headquarters, Santa Rosa, CA, 95407, USA.
Brenda S KennedyCanine Companions for Independence, National Headquarters, Santa Rosa, CA, 95407, USA.
Brian A HareDuke Canine Cognition Center, Department of Evolutionary Anthropology, Duke University, Durham, NC, 27708, USA.
Evan L MacLeanArizona Canine Cognition Center, School of Anthropology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, 85719, USA.
University of Arizona · USCanine Companions for Independence · USDuke University · USNorth Carolina State University · US

Funding

Longitudinal Cognitive and Emotional Development in Working DogsR01HD097732 · NICHD · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI GRUEN, MARGARET ELIZABETH, HARE, BRIAN · 2019 to 2023
$1.9M
American Kennel Club Canine Health Foundation 02518Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development R01HD097732NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD097732Office of Naval Research N00014-16-1-2682Office of Naval Research N00014-17-1-2380
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While our understanding of adult dog cognition has grown considerably over the past 20 years, relatively little is known about the ontogeny of dog cognition. To assess the development and longitudinal stability of cognitive traits in dogs, we administered a battery of tasks to 160 candidate assistance dogs at 2 timepoints. The tasks were designed to measure diverse aspects of cognition, ranging from executive function (e.g., inhibitory control, reversal learning, memory) to sensory discrimination (e.g., vision, audition, olfaction) to social interaction with humans. Subjects first participated as 8-10-week-old puppies, and then were retested on the same tasks at ~ 21 months of age. With few exceptions, task performance improved with age, with the largest effects observed for measures of executive function and social gaze. Results also indicated that individual differences were both early emerging and enduring; for example, social attention to humans, use of human communicative signals, independent persistence at a problem, odor discrimination, and inhibitory control all exhibited moderate levels of rank-order stability between the two timepoints. Using multiple regression, we found that young adult performance on many cognitive tasks could be predicted from a set of cognitive measures collected in early development. Our findings contribute to knowledge about changes in dog cognition across early development as well as the origins and developmental stability of individual differences.

Indexed as

CognitionReversal LearningAnimalsDogsExecutive FunctionLongitudinal StudiesMemoryAssistance dogBehaviorCognitionDevelopmentIndividual differencesLongitudinal

Identifiers

PMID33113034
PMCPMC8035344
OpenAlexW3094882198

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.