Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33113031›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental geochemistry and health2021

Bioaugmentation: possible scenarios due to application of bacterial preparations for remediation of oil-contaminated soil.

Lyudmila G Bakina, Marina V Chugunova, Yulia M Polyak, Natalya V Mayachkina, Alexander O Gerasimov

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental geochemistry and health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lyudmila G BakinaInstitution of Russian Academy of Sciences, Saint-Petersburg Scientific Research Centre for Ecological Safety RAS, Korpusnaya Str. 18, Saint-Petersburg, Russia, 197110.
Marina V ChugunovaInstitution of Russian Academy of Sciences, Saint-Petersburg Scientific Research Centre for Ecological Safety RAS, Korpusnaya Str. 18, Saint-Petersburg, Russia, 197110.
Yulia M PolyakInstitution of Russian Academy of Sciences, Saint-Petersburg Scientific Research Centre for Ecological Safety RAS, Korpusnaya Str. 18, Saint-Petersburg, Russia, 197110. yuliapolyak@mail.ru.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9490-2392
Natalya V MayachkinaInstitution of Russian Academy of Sciences, Saint-Petersburg Scientific Research Centre for Ecological Safety RAS, Korpusnaya Str. 18, Saint-Petersburg, Russia, 197110.
Alexander O GerasimovInstitution of Russian Academy of Sciences, Saint-Petersburg Scientific Research Centre for Ecological Safety RAS, Korpusnaya Str. 18, Saint-Petersburg, Russia, 197110.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although bioaugmentation is known as effective and environmentally friendly method increasing removal of hydrocarbons from oil-contaminated soil, it sometimes fails in soil restoration and disturbs the ecological state of soil. We studied possible scenarios of the introduction of oil-degrading bacteria into oil-contaminated podzolic soil assessing the environmental safety of different bacterial preparations in a long-term field experiment. Integral indicators characterizing the state of biocenosis included biological activity of soil and aboveground biomass of grasses. It has been established that bacterial preparations can have both positive and negative effects on the ecological state of soil and oil biodegradation. Of the five bacterial preparations studied, one had a pronounced positive effect on soil biological activity and oil mineralization processes. Two preparations did not accelerate oil biodegradation and were characterized by a weaker positive effect or even a lack of influence. Two more bacterial preparations had a significant negative impact on soil biological properties. These preparations slowed oil mineralization in soil. Both positive and negative effects of bacterial preparations were observed only during the first two years after their application. All preparations were not effective during the latter stages of long-term remediation processes. The results indicate that successful application of bioaugmentation for the restoration of oil-contaminated soil requires testing of environmental safety of bacterial preparations in a long-term field experiments prior to any treatment processes.

Indexed as

Agricultural InoculantsBacteriaBiodegradation, EnvironmentalEnvironmental Restoration and RemediationHydrocarbonsPetroleumPetroleum PollutionRussiaSoilSoil MicrobiologySoil PollutantsHydrocarbonsPetroleumSoilSoil PollutantsBiological activity of soilOil biodegradationOil pollutionPhytotoxicitySoil microbiota

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.