Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33112931›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Country-level pandemic risk and preparedness classification based on COVID-19 data: A machine learning approach.

Jordan J Bird, Chloe M Barnes, Cristiano Premebida, Anikó Ekárt, Diego R Faria

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. COVID-19 Pandemic Risk Assessment: Systematic Review.Risk management and healthcare policy · 2024
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. AI in Fighting Covid-19: Pandemic Management.Procedia computer science · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. What Can COVID-19 Teach Us about Using AI in Pandemics?Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jordan J BirdAston Robotics, Vision, and Intelligent Systems Lab (ARVIS), School of Engineering and Applied Science, Aston University, Birmingham, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-9858-1231
Chloe M BarnesAston Robotics, Vision, and Intelligent Systems Lab (ARVIS), School of Engineering and Applied Science, Aston University, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Cristiano PremebidaDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Institute of Systems and Robotics, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.
Anikó EkártAston Robotics, Vision, and Intelligent Systems Lab (ARVIS), School of Engineering and Applied Science, Aston University, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Diego R FariaAston Robotics, Vision, and Intelligent Systems Lab (ARVIS), School of Engineering and Applied Science, Aston University, Birmingham, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this work we present a three-stage Machine Learning strategy to country-level risk classification based on countries that are reporting COVID-19 information. A K% binning discretisation (K = 25) is used to create four risk groups of countries based on the risk of transmission (coronavirus cases per million population), risk of mortality (coronavirus deaths per million population), and risk of inability to test (coronavirus tests per million population). The four risk groups produced by K% binning are labelled as 'low', 'medium-low', 'medium-high', and 'high'. Coronavirus-related data are then removed and the attributes for prediction of the three types of risk are given as the geopolitical and demographic data describing each country. Thus, the calculation of class label is based on coronavirus data but the input attributes are country-level information regardless of coronavirus data. The three four-class classification problems are then explored and benchmarked through leave-one-country-out cross validation to find the strongest model, producing a Stack of Gradient Boosting and Decision Tree algorithms for risk of transmission, a Stack of Support Vector Machine and Extra Trees for risk of mortality, and a Gradient Boosting algorithm for the risk of inability to test. It is noted that high risk for inability to test is often coupled with low risks for transmission and mortality, therefore the risk of inability to test should be interpreted first, before consideration is given to the predicted transmission and mortality risks. Finally, the approach is applied to more recent risk levels to data from September 2020 and weaker results are noted due to the growth of international collaboration detracting useful knowledge from country-level attributes which suggests that similar machine learning approaches are more useful prior to situations later unfolding.

Indexed as

BetacoronavirusDisaster PlanningMachine LearningModels, TheoreticalPandemicsAlgorithmsClassificationClinical Laboratory TechniquesCoronavirus InfectionsCOVID-19COVID-19 TestingDecision TreesForecastingGlobal HealthHumansInternational CooperationReagent Kits, Diagnostic

Identifiers

PMID33112931
PMCPMC7592809

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.