Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33112848›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2020

Locally adaptive Bayesian birth-death model successfully detects slow and rapid rate shifts.

Andrew F Magee, Sebastian Höhna, Tetyana I Vasylyeva, Adam D Leaché, Vladimir N Minin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Habitat-specific temporal variation in the pace of fish diversification.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Rapidly changing speciation and extinction rates can be inferred in spite of nonidentifiability.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Andrew F MageeDepartment of Biology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA.
Sebastian HöhnaGeoBio-Center, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, 80333 Munich, Germany.
Tetyana I VasylyevaDepartment of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-9736-7022
Adam D LeachéDepartment of Biology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA.
Vladimir N MininDepartment of Statistics, University of California, Irvine, CA, 92697, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1917-9288
University of Washington · USLudwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DEUniversity of California, Irvine · USUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

BAYESIAN MODELING AND DATA INTEGRATION IN INFECTIOUS DISEASE PHYLODYNAMICSR01AI107034 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI MININ, VOLODYMYR · 2013 to 2017
$1.7M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI107034
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Birth-death processes have given biologists a model-based framework to answer questions about changes in the birth and death rates of lineages in a phylogenetic tree. Therefore birth-death models are central to macroevolutionary as well as phylodynamic analyses. Early approaches to studying temporal variation in birth and death rates using birth-death models faced difficulties due to the restrictive choices of birth and death rate curves through time. Sufficiently flexible time-varying birth-death models are still lacking. We use a piecewise-constant birth-death model, combined with both Gaussian Markov random field (GMRF) and horseshoe Markov random field (HSMRF) prior distributions, to approximate arbitrary changes in birth rate through time. We implement these models in the widely used statistical phylogenetic software platform RevBayes, allowing us to jointly estimate birth-death process parameters, phylogeny, and nuisance parameters in a Bayesian framework. We test both GMRF-based and HSMRF-based models on a variety of simulated diversification scenarios, and then apply them to both a macroevolutionary and an epidemiological dataset. We find that both models are capable of inferring variable birth rates and correctly rejecting variable models in favor of effectively constant models. In general the HSMRF-based model has higher precision than its GMRF counterpart, with little to no loss of accuracy. Applied to a macroevolutionary dataset of the Australian gecko family Pygopodidae (where birth rates are interpretable as speciation rates), the GMRF-based model detects a slow decrease whereas the HSMRF-based model detects a rapid speciation-rate decrease in the last 12 million years. Applied to an infectious disease phylodynamic dataset of sequences from HIV subtype A in Russia and Ukraine (where birth rates are interpretable as the rate of accumulation of new infections), our models detect a strongly elevated rate of infection in the 1990s.

Indexed as

Birth RateModels, BiologicalModels, StatisticalMortalityAlgorithmsAnimalsBayes TheoremBiological EvolutionComputational BiologyComputer SimulationLizards

Identifiers

PMID33112848
PMCPMC7652323
OpenAlexW3097794559

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.