ReviewTranscription2020
Archaeal transcription.
Review in Transcription, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Asgard archaea: have we found our microbial ancestors?The EMBO journal · 2026Review
- The Thermococcales as a model system: historical perspectives and emerging tools.Journal of bacteriology · 2025Review
- Biogeography and host interactions of CPR and DPANN viruses in acid mine drainage sediments.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Review
- Discovery of Diverse CRISPR Leader Motifs, Putative Functions, and Applications for Enhanced CRISPR Detection and Subtype Annotation.The CRISPR journal · 2025Article
- High hydrostatic pressure promotes gene transcription via a cystathionine-β-synthase domain-containing protein in the hyperthermophilic archaeon Pyrococcus yayanosii.Nucleic acids research · 2025Article
- Sequencing-based analysis of microbiomes.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2024Review
- The Archaeal Cell Cycle.Annual review of cell and developmental biology · 2024Review
- Archaeal histone-based chromatin structures regulate transcription elongation rates.Communications biology · 2024Article
- Putative nucleotide-based second messengers in archaea.microLife · 2023Review
- TrmB Family Transcription Factor as a Thiol-Based Regulator of Oxidative Stress Response.mBio · 2022Article
- RNA polymerase pausing, stalling and bypass during transcription of damaged DNA: from molecular basis to functional consequences.Nucleic acids research · 2022Review
- aCPSF1 cooperates with terminator U-tract to dictate archaeal transcription termination efficacy.eLife · 2021Article
- Comparative genomics of DNA-binding transcription factors in archaeal and bacterial organisms.PloS one · 2021Article
- Transcribing Genes the Hard Way:Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Increasingly sophisticated biochemical and genetic techniques are unraveling the regulatory factors and mechanisms that control gene expression in the Archaea. While some similarities in regulatory strategies are universal, archaeal-specific regulatory strategies are emerging to complement a complex patchwork of shared archaeal-bacterial and archaeal-eukaryotic regulatory mechanisms employed in the archaeal domain. The prokaryotic archaea encode core transcription components with homology to the eukaryotic transcription apparatus and also share a simplified eukaryotic-like initiation mechanism, but also deploy tactics common to bacterial systems to regulate promoter usage and influence elongation-termination decisions. We review the recently established complete archaeal transcription cycle, highlight recent findings of the archaeal transcription community and detail the expanding post-initiation regulation imposed on archaeal transcription.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.