Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33112713›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being2020

Under what circumstances can immigrant patients and healthcare professionals co-produce health? - an interpretive scoping review.

Christina Radl-Karimi, Anne Nicolaisen, Morten Sodemann, Paul Batalden, Christian von Plessen

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Health-related integration interventions for migrants by civil society organizations: an integrative review.International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being · 2021
    Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Christina Radl-KarimiOPEN Odense Patient Data Explorative Network, University of Southern Denmark and Odense University Hospital , Odense C, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5991-7134
Anne NicolaisenResearch Unit of General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark , Odense C, Denmark.
Morten SodemannMigrant Health Clinic, Odense Universitetshospital , Odense C, Denmark.
Paul BataldenThe Dartmouth Institute, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth , Hanover, NH, USA.
Christian von PlessenDirection générale de la santé, Unisanté , Lausanne, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeImmigrant patients run a risk of receiving lower quality of care. Co-production, as the concept of how to collaboratively create valuable healthcare service for the patient, offers a new perspective that might help. The scoping review aimed at identifying and analysing factors facilitating co-production between immigrant patients and healthcare professionals.

methodsWe searched seven scientific databases for peer-reviewed publications of all study designs. Two reviewers independently screened the publications for eligibility and performed data extraction. Data were analysed by applying an inductive, interpretive approach for data synthesis.

resultsFifteen publications were included for analysis. We identified six factors hat facilitate co-production: 1) prioritizing co-production in the organization, 2) providing a safe environment that promotes trust and patience, 3) using a language the patient understands, 4) respecting the patient's knowledge and priorities, 5) improvising with knowledge and courage, and 6) engaging in self-reflection.

conclusionsThe scoping review illustrated that co-production with immigrant patients can be successful if the system and professionals are interested and prepared. Immigrant patients could be a valuable source of information and powerful co-producers of their own health. The study contributed to a growing body of research on patient-professional co-production in healthcare and might also prove relevant for other disadvantaged patient groups.

Indexed as

Emigrants and ImmigrantsHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHealth PersonnelHumansLanguagePatient ParticipationProfessional-Patient RelationsQuality of Health CareCo-productionculturally competent carehealthcare serviceimmigrant patientpatient-provider relationshipperson-centred carerefugee patient

Identifiers

PMID33112713
PMCPMC7599002

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.