ArticleJCO global oncology2020
Long-Term Toxicity and Efficacy of Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy in Cervical Cancers: Experience of a Cancer Hospital in Pakistan.
Article in JCO global oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Deep learning in CT image segmentation of cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Radiation oncology (London, England) · 2022Pooled it
- Article
- A comparative analysis of toxicity and treatment outcomes of adaptive radiotherapy and intensity-modulated radiotherapy in cervical cancer.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Retrospective analysis of efficacy and safety of recombinant human Rh-endostatinstatin combined with concurrent radiotherapy for cervical cancer.Pakistan journal of medical sciences · 2024Article
- Navigating mental health in a post-COVID world: the experience of colorectal cancer patients.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2023Article
- Aggravation of Hemorrhoids in Patients With Cervical Cancer Undergoing Radiotherapy: A Nationwide Population-based Study.In vivo (Athens, Greece)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo report the chronic toxicity and disease outcomes attributable to intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) in patients with cervical cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between January 2014 and December 2018, a retrospective review of medical records of patients with cervical cancer who received radiation therapy with IMRT was performed. Disease and treatment-related details were documented. Follow-up notes were reviewed, and severity of late toxicities was recorded. Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) at 3 years were estimated.
resultsA total of 222 patients' records were reviewed. Mean age was 50.7 years. Median follow-up duration was 33 months (range, 2-70 months). The most common toxicity was vaginal stricture (grade 2, n = 59, 26.6%; grade 3, n = 4, 1.80%), followed by proctitis (grade 2, n = 24; 10.8%; grade 3, n = 7; 3.20%). Seven patients (grade 2, n = 5, 2.3%; grade 3, n = 2; 0.90%) developed cystitis, and only 5 (grade 2; 2.3%) were found to have colitis. None of the patients had grade 4 or grade 5 toxicities. There was a significant difference in late complications in patients with nodal disease or those who underwent prior surgery (
conclusionIMRT is an effective and well-tolerated technique that should be considered in patients with lymph node disease and in postoperative patients. There is an inverse relationship between tumor size and nodal involvement with respect to OS and DFS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.