Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33112659›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental health perspectives2020

Drivers of and Obstacles to the Adoption of Toxicogenomics for Chemical Risk Assessment: Insights from Social Science Perspectives.

Guillaume Pain, Gordon Hickey, Matthieu Mondou, Doug Crump, Markus Hecker, Niladri Basu, Steven Maguire

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental health perspectives, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Strategies to apply 3Rs in preclinical testing.Pharmacology research & perspectives · 2021
    Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Guillaume PainFaculté des sciences de l'administration, Université Laval, Sainte-Foy, Québec, Canada.
Gordon HickeyFaculty of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, McGill University, Sainte Anne de Bellevue, Quebec, Canada.
Matthieu MondouFaculty of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, McGill University, Sainte Anne de Bellevue, Quebec, Canada.
Doug CrumpNational Wildlife Research Center, Environment and Climate Change Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Markus HeckerToxicology Center and School of the Environment & Sustainability, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.
Niladri BasuFaculty of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, McGill University, Sainte Anne de Bellevue, Quebec, Canada.
Steven MaguireUniversity of Sydney Business School and University of Sydney Nano Institute, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
McGill University · CAEnvironment and Climate Change Canada · CAThe University of Sydney · AUUniversité Laval · CAUniversity of Saskatchewan · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSome 20 y ago, scientific and regulatory communities identified the potential of omics sciences (genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, metabolomics) to improve chemical risk assessment through development of toxicogenomics. Recognizing that regulators adopt new scientific methods cautiously given accountability to diverse stakeholders, the scope and pace of adoption of toxicogenomics tools and data have nonetheless not met the ambitious, early expectations of omics proponents.

objectiveOur objective was, therefore, to inventory, investigate, and derive insights into drivers of and obstacles to adoption of toxicogenomics in chemical risk assessment. By invoking established social science frameworks conceptualizing innovation adoption, we also aimed to develop recommendations for proponents of toxicogenomics and other new approach methodologies (NAMs).

methodsWe report findings from an analysis of 56 scientific and regulatory publications from 1998 through 2017 that address the adoption of toxicogenomics for chemical risk assessment. From this purposeful sample of toxicogenomics discourse, we identified major categories of drivers of and obstacles to adoption of toxicogenomics tools and data sets. We then mapped these categories onto social science frameworks for conceptualizing innovation adoption to generate actionable insights for proponents of toxicogenomics. DISCUSSION: We identify the most salient drivers and obstacles. From 1998 through 2017, adoption of toxicogenomics was understood to be helped by drivers such as those we labeled

Indexed as

Computational BiologySocial SciencesToxicogeneticsEnvironmental PolicyGenomicsHumansMetabolomicsRisk Assessment

Identifiers

PMID33112659
PMCPMC7592882
OpenAlexW3095557251

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.