ArticleFemale pelvic medicine & reconstructive surgery2020
Translating Sexual Dysfunction: Does Language Impact Clinical Discussion of Painful Sex?
Article in Female pelvic medicine & reconstructive surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesDyspareunia and sexual dysfunction are estimated to affect up to 22% and 43% of women, respectively. There is concern that these statistics do not depict the true prevalence and that these conditions are frequently undiagnosed and untreated. By 2060, Latinos will make up 30% of the total population in the United States. Because our patient population becomes more diverse, we need to ensure that our healthcare practices accommodate the changes.
methodsWe surveyed a convenience sample of 107 English and 71 Spanish-speaking women, aged 18 to 45 years, at university-affiliated clinics to identify the prevalence of dyspareunia and sexual dysfunction within our community. In addition, we wanted to identify the rate that clinicians discuss painful sex with patients to identify whether language impacted communication. The surveys collected data on subjective reporting of pain with sex and objective identification of sexual dysfunction with the Female Sexual Function Index. Additional questions identified if subjects discussed pain with their clinician. These questions were analyzed between languages across all domains.
resultsA greater prevalence of both dyspareunia and sexual dysfunction was measured in our study population compared with previous reports (37.79% and 54.71%, respectively). Spanish-speaking women had significantly lower self-reported dyspareunia (28.99%) but scored significantly lower on the Female Sexual Function Index, qualifying for sexual dysfunction (63.24%). Spanish speakers discussed painful sex significantly less compared with the English cohort, but the overall discussion rate was only 17.26%.
conclusionsThese pilot data demonstrate a need for further research on language as a barrier to communication about sexual function in clinic.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.