ArticleHuman brain mapping2021
Language distance in orthographic transparency affects cross-language pattern similarity between native and non-native languages.
Article in Human brain mapping, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Neural Assimilation and Accommodation in Trilinguals: An fMRI Study at 7 T.Human brain mapping · 2026Article
- A Review of Neuroimaging Research of Chinese as a Second Language: Insights from the Assimilation-Accommodation Framework.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Phonological properties of logographic words modulate brain activation in bilinguals: a comparative study of Chinese characters and Japanese Kanji.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2024Article
- Greater neural pattern similarity to the native language is associated with better novel word learning.Frontiers in psychology · 2024Article
- Stimulus Repetition and Sample Size Considerations in Item-Level Representational Similarity Analysis.Language, cognition and neuroscience · 2024Article
- The depth of semantic processing modulates cross-language pattern similarity in Chinese-English bilinguals.Human brain mapping · 2023Article
- Intersecting distributed networks support convergent linguistic functioning across different languages in bilinguals.Communications biology · 2023Article
- Neural representation of phonological information during Chinese character reading.Human brain mapping · 2022Article
- The Brain Connectome for Chinese Reading.Neuroscience bulletin · 2022Review
- Resting-state occipito-frontal alpha connectome is linked to differential word learning ability in adult learners.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2022Article
- Individuals' preference on reading pathways influences the involvement of neural pathways in phonological learning.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Article
- Language distance in orthographic transparency affects cross-language pattern similarity between native and non-native languages.Human brain mapping · 2021Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
How native and non-native languages are represented in the brain is one of the most important questions in neurolinguistics. Much research has found that the similarity in neural activity of native and non-native languages are influenced by factors such as age of acquisition, language proficiency, and language exposure in the non-native language. Nevertheless, it is still unclear how the similarity between native and non-native languages in orthographic transparency, a key factor that affects the cognitive and neural mechanisms of phonological access, modulates the cross-language similarity in neural activation and which brain regions show the modulatory effects of language distance in orthographic transparency. To address these questions, the present study used representational similarity analysis (RSA) to precisely estimate the neural pattern similarity between native language and two non-native languages in Uyghur-Chinese-English trilinguals, whose third language (i.e., English) was more similar to the native language (i.e., Uyghur) in orthography than to their second language (i.e., Chinese). Behavioral results revealed that subjects responded faster to words in the non-native language with more similar orthography to their native language in the word naming task. More importantly, RSA revealed greater neural pattern similarity between Uyghur and English than between Uyghur and Chinese in select brain areas for phonological processing, especially in the left hemisphere. Further analysis confirmed that those brain regions represented phonological information. These results provide direct neuroimaging evidence for the modulatory effect of language distance in orthographic transparency on cross-language pattern similarity between native and non-native languages during word reading.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.