Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33112418›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2020

Endometrial preparation for women undergoing embryo transfer with frozen embryos or embryos derived from donor oocytes.

Demián Glujovsky, Romina Pesce, Carlos Sueldo, Andrea Marta Quinteiro Retamar, Roger J Hart, Agustín Ciapponi

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06875752 (Is There a Need for Luteal Support in Modified Natural Cycle Frozen Embryo Transfer Cycles), which is not on this map. Cited by 87 papers, 10 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
87citing papers in PubMed, 10 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06875752 phase4recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Is There a Need for Luteal Support in Modified Natural Cycle Frozen Embryo Transfer Cycles: a Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorDunamenti REK Istenhegyi IVF CenterRan2025 to 2026Enrolled180ConditionsLuteal Support, Frozen Embryo Transfer (FET)Armsno luteal support, Vaginal Progesterone, Progesterone plus HCG
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

87 citing papers in PubMed, 10 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Reproductive outcome after frozen embryo transfer with hormone replacement therapy according to luteal-phase support protocol: systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Comparison of Luteal Support Protocols in Frozen IVF/ICSI Cycles: A Network Meta-Analysis.BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Vasodilators for women undergoing fertility treatment.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Oxytocin antagonists for assisted reproduction.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

27 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Demián GlujovskyReproductive Medicine, CEGYR (Centro de Estudios en Genética y Reproducción), Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Romina PesceReproductive Medicine, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Carlos SueldoReproductive Medicine, CEGYR (Centro de Estudios en Ginecologia y Reproducción), Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Andrea Marta Quinteiro RetamarEggs donation program - Genetics unit, CEGYR (Centro de Estudios en Ginecologia y Reproducción), Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Roger J HartSchool of Women's and Infants' Health, The University of Western Australia, King Edward Memorial Hospital and Fertility Specialists of Western Australia, Subiaco, Perth, Australia.
Agustín CiapponiArgentine Cochrane Centre, Institute for Clinical Effectiveness and Health Policy (IECS-CONICET), Buenos Aires, Argentina.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycle is when one or more embryos (frozen during a previous treatment cycle) are thawed and transferred to the uterus. Some women undergo fresh embryo transfer (ET) cycles with embryos derived from donated oocytes. In both situations, the endometrium is primed with oestrogen and progestogen in different doses and routes of administration.

objectivesTo evaluate the most effective endometrial preparation for women undergoing transfer with frozen embryos or embryos from donor oocytes with regard to the subsequent live birth rate (LBR). SEARCH

methodsThe Cochrane Gynaecology and Fertility Group trials register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, LILACS, trials registers and abstracts of reproductive societies' meetings were searched in June 2020 together with reference checking and contact with study authors and experts in the field to identify additional studies. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating endometrial preparation in women undergoing fresh donor cycles and frozen embryo transfers. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We used standard methodological procedures recommended by Cochrane. We analysed all available interventions versus placebo, no treatment, or between each other. The primary review outcome was live birth rate. Secondary outcomes were clinical and multiple pregnancy, miscarriage, cycle cancellation, endometrial thickness and adverse effects. MAIN

resultsThirty-one RCTs (5426 women) were included. Evidence was moderate to very low-quality: the main limitations were serious risk of bias due to poor reporting of methods, and serious imprecision. Stimulated versus programmed cycle We are uncertain whether a letrozole-stimulated cycle compared to a programmed cycle, for endometrial preparation, improves LBR (odds ratio (OR) 1.26, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.49 to 3.26; 100 participants; one study; very low-quality evidence). Stimulating with follicle stimulating hormone (FSH), letrozole or clomiphene citrate may improve clinical pregnancy rate (CPR) (OR 1.63, 95% CI 1.12 to 2.38; 656 participants; five studies; I AUTHORS'

conclusionsThere is insufficient evidence on the use of any particular intervention for endometrial preparation in women undergoing fresh donor cycles and frozen embryo transfers. In frozen embryo transfers, low-quality evidence showed that clinical pregnancy rates may be improved in a stimulated cycle compared to a programmed one, and we are uncertain of the effect when comparing a programmed cycle to a natural cycle. Cycle cancellation rates are probably reduced in a natural cycle. Although administering a GnRH agonist, compared to without, may improve live birth rates, clinical pregnancy rates will probably be improved in a GnRH antagonist cycle over an agonist cycle. In fresh synchronised oocyte donor cycles, the clinical pregnancy rate is probably improved and cycle cancellation rates are probably reduced when starting progestogen the day of or day after donor oocyte retrieval. Adequately powered studies are needed to evaluate each treatment more accurately.

Indexed as

CryopreservationEmbryo, MammalianOocyte DonationAbortion, SpontaneousBiasClomipheneDrug Administration ScheduleEmbryo ImplantationEmbryo TransferEndometriumFemaleFollicle Stimulating HormoneGonadotropin-Releasing HormoneHumansLetrozoleLive BirthClomipheneFollicle Stimulating HormoneGonadotropin-Releasing HormoneLetrozoleProgesteroneProgestins

Identifiers

PMID33112418
PMCPMC8094620

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.