Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33112416›Full record

SynthesisCancer2021

Pain in long-term survivors of childhood cancer: A systematic review of the current state of knowledge and a call to action from the Children's Oncology Group.

Fiona S M Schulte, Michaela Patton, Nicole M Alberts, Alicia Kunin-Batson, Barbara A Olson-Bullis, Caitlin Forbes, K Brooke Russell, Alexandra Neville, Lauren C Heathcote, Cynthia W Karlson and 7 more

Open access · greenAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Cancer, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
10.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Mapping and comparing the quality of life outcomes in childhood and adolescent and young adult cancer survivors: an umbrella review and future directions.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 9 institutions in 2 countries.

Fiona S M SchulteDepartment of Oncology, Division of Psychosocial Oncology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-3076-9676
Michaela PattonDepartment of Psychology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Nicole M AlbertsDepartment of Psychology, Concordia University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Alicia Kunin-BatsonDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Barbara A Olson-BullisHealthPartners Institute, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Caitlin ForbesDepartment of Oncology, Division of Psychosocial Oncology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
K Brooke RussellDepartment of Psychology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-1190-7014
Alexandra NevilleDepartment of Psychology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Lauren C HeathcoteDepartment of Anesthesiology, Perioperative, and Pain Medicine, Stanford University Medical School, Stanford, California.
Cynthia W KarlsonDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, Mississippi.ORCID 0000-0002-7597-6505
Nicole M RacineDepartment of Psychology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Courtney CharnockDepartment of Oncology, Division of Psychosocial Oncology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Matthew C HockingCenter for Childhood Cancer Research and Division of Oncology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Pia BanerjeeEpidemiology and Cancer Control, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee.
Perri R TutelmanDepartments of Psychology and Neuroscience, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-6013-7402
Melanie NoelDepartment of Psychology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Kevin R KrullEpidemiology and Cancer Control, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee.ORCID 0000-0002-0476-7001
University of Calgary · CASt. Jude Children's Research Hospital · USChildren's Hospital of Philadelphia · USConcordia University · CADalhousie University · CAHealthPartners · USJackson Memorial Hospital · USStanford Medicine · USUniversity of Minnesota · US

Funding

NCTN BIQSFP ANBL1531 (NRT)U10CA180886 · NCI · PUBLIC HEALTH INSTITUTE · PI Douglas S. Hawkins · 2014 to 2026
$390.6M
COG SDMC - Statistics CoreU10CA180899 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI TODD A ALONZO · 2014 to 2026
$132.8M
Towards a preventive cancer vaccine for children with constitutional mismatch repair deficiencyUG1CA189955 · NCI · PUBLIC HEALTH INSTITUTE · PI BRAD H POLLOCK, Michael E. Roth · 2014 to 2026
$62.5M
NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180886NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180899NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA189955
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Survivors of childhood cancer may be at risk of experiencing pain, and a systematic review would advance our understanding of pain in this population. The objective of this study was to describe: 1) the prevalence of pain in survivors of childhood cancer, 2) methods of pain measurement, 3) associations between pain and biopsychosocial factors, and 4) recommendations for future research. Data sources for the study were articles published from January 1990 to August 2019 identified in the PubMed, PsycINFO, EMBASE, and Web of Science data bases. Eligible studies included: 1) original research, 2) quantitative assessments of pain, 3) articles published in English, 4) cancers diagnosed between birth and age 21 years, 5) survivors at 5 years from diagnosis and/or at 2 years after therapy completion, and 6) a sample size >20. Seventy-three articles were included in the final review. Risk of bias was considered using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. The quality of evidence was evaluated according to Grading of Recommendations Assessment Development and Evaluation (GRADE) criteria. Common measures of pain were items created by the authors for the purpose of the study (45.2%) or health-related quality-of-life/health status questionnaires (42.5%). Pain was present in from 4.3% to 75% of survivors across studies. Three studies investigated chronic pain according the definition in the International Classification of Diseases. The findings indicated that survivors of childhood cancer are at higher risk of experiencing pain compared with controls. Fatigue was consistently associated with pain, females reported more pain than males, and other factors related to pain will require stronger evidence. Theoretically grounded, multidimensional measurements of pain are absent from the literature.

Indexed as

Cancer SurvivorsFemaleHumansMalePainRisk Assessmentneoplasmspainpediatricspsycho-oncologysurvivorship

Identifiers

PMID33112416
PMCPMC7875461
OpenAlexW3096895161

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.