ArticleJAMA network open2020
Rates of Brain Atrophy Across Disease Stages in Familial Frontotemporal Dementia Associated With MAPT, GRN, and C9orf72 Pathogenic Variants.
Article in JAMA network open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.
- Longitudinal functional network connectivity changes across the clinical stages of C9orf72 hexanucleotide repeat expansion carriers.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026Article
- Frontotemporal dementia with right temporal predominance: a clinical comparison with left-predominant FTD.Journal of neurology · 2026Article
- Composite grey matter fingerprints for genetic frontotemporal dementia.Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry · 2026Article
- Mapping the multiscale neuroanatomy of GRN-related frontotemporal dementia using mode-based morphometry.NeuroImage. Clinical · 2026Article
- Update on Disease-Modifying Pharmacological Treatments for Frontotemporal Dementia (FTD): A Scoping Review of Registered Trials.NeuroSci · 2025Review
- Design considerations for C9orf72 disease prevention trials.Brain : a journal of neurology · 2025Review
- Executive Function Deficits in Genetic Frontotemporal Dementia: Results From the GENFI Study.Neurology. Genetics · 2025Article
- Clinical and Imaging Features of Sporadic and Genetic Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration TDP-43 A and B.Annals of clinical and translational neurology · 2025Article
- Disparate and shared transcriptomic signatures associated with cortical atrophy in genetic behavioral variant frontotemporal degeneration.Molecular neurodegeneration · 2025Article
- Gene-Specific Effects on Brain Volume and Cognition ofNeurology · 2024Article
- Beyond the usual suspects: multi-factorial computational models in the search for neurodegenerative disease mechanisms.Translational psychiatry · 2024Review
- Gene specific effects on brain volume and cognition ofmedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2024Article
- Clinical dimensions along the non-fluent variant primary progressive aphasia spectrum.Brain : a journal of neurology · 2024Article
- Novel data-driven subtypes and stages of brain atrophy in the ALS-FTD spectrum.Translational neurodegeneration · 2023Article
- Network Connectivity Alterations across the MAPT Mutation Clinical Spectrum.Annals of neurology · 2023Article
- Frontotemporal lobar degeneration.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2023Review
- Plasma inflammation for predicting phenotypic conversion and clinical progression of autosomal dominant frontotemporal lobar degeneration.Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry · 2023Article
- Shared molecular genetic factors influence subcortical brain morphometry and Parkinson's disease risk.NPJ Parkinson's disease · 2023Article
- Structural MRI predicts clinical progression in presymptomatic genetic frontotemporal dementia: findings from the GENetic Frontotemporal dementia Initiative cohort.Brain communications · 2023Article
- Neurocognitive patterns across genetic levels in behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia: a multiple single cases study.BMC neurology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
28 authors at 9 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: Several clinical trials are planned for familial forms of frontotemporal lobar degeneration (f-FTLD). Precise modeling of brain atrophy in f-FTLD could improve the power to detect a treatment effect. Objective: To characterize regions and rates of atrophy in the 3 primary f-FTLD genetic groups (MAPT, GRN, and C9orf72) across all disease stages from asymptomatic to dementia. Design, Setting, and Participants: This investigation was a case-control study of participants enrolled in the Advancing Research and Treatment for Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration or Longitudinal Evaluation of Familial Frontotemporal Dementia studies. The study took place at 18 North American academic medical centers between January 2009 and September 2018. Participants with f-FTLD (n = 100) with a known pathogenic variant (MAPT [n = 28], GRN [n = 33], or C9orf72 [n = 39]) were grouped according to disease stage (ie, Clinical Dementia Rating [CDR] plus National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center [NACC] FTLD module). Included were participants with at least 2 structural magnetic resonance images at presymptomatic (CDR + NACC FTLD = 0 [n = 57]), mild or questionable (CDR + NACC FTLD = 0.5 [n = 15]), or symptomatic (CDR + NACC FTLD = ≥1 [n = 28]) disease stages. The control group included family members of known pathogenic variant carriers who did not carry the pathogenic variant (n = 60). Main Outcomes and Measures: This study fitted bayesian linear mixed-effects models in each voxel of the brain to quantify the rate of atrophy in each of the 3 genes, at each of the 3 disease stages, compared with controls. The study also analyzed rates of clinical decline in each of these groups, as measured by the CDR + NACC FTLD box score. Results: The sample included 100 participants with f-FTLD with a known pathogenic variant (mean [SD] age, 50.48 [13.78] years; 53 [53%] female) and 60 family members of known pathogenic variant carriers who did not carry the pathogenic variant (mean [SD] age, 47.51 [12.43] years; 36 [60%] female). MAPT and GRN pathogenic variants were associated with increased rates of volume loss compared with controls at all stages of disease. In MAPT pathogenic variant carriers, statistically significant regions of accelerated volume loss compared with controls were identified in temporal regions bilaterally in the presymptomatic stage, with global spread in the symptomatic stage. For example, mean [SD] rates of atrophy in the left temporal were -231 [47] mm3 per year during the presymptomatic stage, -381 [208] mm3 per year during the mild stage, and -1485 [1025] mm3 per year during the symptomatic stage (P < .05). GRN pathogenic variant carriers generally had minimal increases in atrophy rates between the presymptomatic and mild stages, with rapid increases in atrophy rates in the symptomatic stages. For example, in the right frontal lobes, annualized volume loss was -267 [81] mm3 per year in the presymptomatic stage and -182 [90] mm3 per year in the mild stage, but -1169 [555] mm3 per year in the symptomatic stage. Compared with the other groups, C9orf72 expansion carriers showed minimal increases in rate of volume loss with disease progression. For example, the mean (SD) annualized rates of atrophy in the right frontal lobe in C9orf72 expansion carriers was -272 (118) mm3 per year in presymptomatic stages, -310 (189) mm3 per year in mildly symptomatic stages, and -251 (145) mm3 per year in symptomatic stages. Conclusions and Relevance: These findings are relevant to clinical trial planning and suggest that the mechanism by which C9orf72 pathogenic variants lead to symptoms may be fundamentally different from the mechanisms associated with other pathogenic variants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.