Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33111751›Full record

ArticleMemorias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz2020

SARS-CoV-2 isolation from the first reported patients in Brazil and establishment of a coordinated task network.

Danielle Bastos Araujo, Rafael Rahal Guaragna Machado, Deyvid Emanuel Amgarten, Fernanda de Mello Malta, Gabriel Guarany de Araujo, Cairo Oliveira Monteiro, Erika Donizetti Candido, Camila Pereira Soares, Fernando Gatti de Menezes, Ana Carolina Cornachioni Pires and 10 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Memorias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 70 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
70citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

70 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 117 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

10 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Danielle Bastos AraujoUniversidade de São Paulo, Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas, Departamento de Microbiologia, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2987-7466
Rafael Rahal Guaragna MachadoUniversidade de São Paulo, Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas, Departamento de Microbiologia, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
Deyvid Emanuel AmgartenHospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
Fernanda de Mello MaltaHospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
Gabriel Guarany de AraujoUniversidade de São Paulo, Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas, Departamento de Microbiologia, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
Cairo Oliveira MonteiroUniversidade de São Paulo, Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas, Departamento de Microbiologia, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
Erika Donizetti CandidoUniversidade de São Paulo, Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas, Departamento de Microbiologia, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
Camila Pereira SoaresUniversidade de São Paulo, Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas, Departamento de Microbiologia, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
Fernando Gatti de MenezesHospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
Ana Carolina Cornachioni PiresHospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
Rúbia Anita Ferraz SantanaHospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
Amanda de Oliveira VianaUniversidade de São Paulo, Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas, Departamento de Microbiologia, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
Erick DorlassUniversidade de São Paulo, Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas, Departamento de Microbiologia, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
Luciano ThomazelliUniversidade de São Paulo, Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas, Departamento de Microbiologia, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
Luis Carlos de Sousa FerreiraUniversidade de São Paulo, Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas, Departamento de Microbiologia, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
Viviane Fongaro BotossoInstituto Butantã, Centro de Inovação e Desenvolvimento, Laboratório de Virologia, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
Cristiane Rodrigues Guzzo CarvalhoUniversidade de São Paulo, Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas, Departamento de Microbiologia, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
Danielle Bruna Leal OliveiraUniversidade de São Paulo, Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas, Departamento de Microbiologia, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
João Renato Rebello PinhoHospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
Edison Luiz DurigonUniversidade de São Paulo, Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas, Departamento de Microbiologia, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
Universidade de São Paulo · BRHospital Israelita Albert Einstein · BRInstituto Butantan · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) was confirmed in Brazil in February 2020, the first cases were followed by an increase in the number of cases throughout the country, resulting in an important public health crisis that requires fast and coordinated responses.

objectivesThe objective of this work is to describe the isolation and propagation properties of SARS-CoV-2 isolates from the first confirmed cases of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in Brazil.

methodsAfter diagnosis in patients that returned from Italy to the São Paulo city in late February by RT-PCR, SARS-CoV-2 isolates were obtained in cell cultures and characterised by full genome sequencing, electron microscopy and in vitro replication properties.

findingsThe virus isolate was recovered from nasopharyngeal specimen, propagated in Vero cells (E6, CCL-81 and hSLAM), with clear cytopathic effects, and characterised by full genome sequencing, electron microscopy and in vitro replication properties. Virus stocks - viable (titre 2.11 × 106 TCID50/mL, titre 1.5 × 106 PFUs/mL) and inactivated from isolate SARS.CoV2/SP02.2020.HIAE.Br were prepared and set available to the public health authorities and the scientific community in Brazil and abroad. MAIN

conclusionWe believe that the protocols for virus growth and studies here described and the distribution initiative may constitute a viable model for other developing countries, not only to help a rapid effective pandemic response, but also to facilitate and support basic scientific research.

Indexed as

Coronavirus InfectionsPandemicsPneumonia, ViralAnimalsBetacoronavirusBrazilChlorocebus aethiopsCOVID-19HumansSARS-CoV-2Vero Cells

Identifiers

PMID33111751
PMCPMC7586445
OpenAlexW3094307568

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.