Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33111385›Full record

ArticlePaediatric and perinatal epidemiology2021

Disparities in neonatal abstinence syndrome and health insurance status: A statewide study using non-claims real-time surveillance data.

Amna Umer, Christa Lilly, Candice Hamilton, Janine Breyel, Lindsay Allen, Ancilla Rompala, Carrie Moore, Patricia O'Dierno, Collin John

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Paediatric and perinatal epidemiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Amna UmerDepartment of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2987-7650
Christa LillyDepartment of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA.
Candice HamiltonDepartment of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA.
Janine BreyelWest Virginia Perinatal Partnership, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA.
Lindsay AllenDepartment Health Policy, Management, and Leadership, School of Public Health, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA.
Ancilla RompalaDepartment of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA.
Carrie MooreDepartment of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA.
Patricia O'DiernoDepartment of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA.
Collin JohnDepartment of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA.

Funding

West Virginia IDEA-CTRU54GM104942 · NIGMS · WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY · PI Laura F. Gibson · 2012 to 2026
$81.0M
NIGMS NIH HHS U54 GM104942
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMost studies examining the relationship between neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS) and health insurance status in the United States (USA) have used administrative insurance claims data, which is subject to myriad limitations. We examined the association between NAS and health insurance status in a large geographically defined rural population in the United States, using non-claims data.

methodsWe utilized data from a population-based cohort of all newborns born in 2017-2019 in the rural state of West Virginia (WV) and restricted analyses to WV residents' births (n = 46 213). NAS was defined as neonatal withdrawal from many substances, including opiates and not limited to those cases that require pharmacological treatment.

resultsMedicaid covered more than half (52.6%) of all infants' births in the state of WV. The incidence of NAS was 85.8 and 12.7 per 1000 livebirths in the Medicaid and privately insured groups, respectively. Among all infants diagnosed with NAS, 86.1% were enrolled in the state's Medicaid programme. The risk of NAS in the Medicaid-insured newborns was higher than privately insured newborns in the unadjusted analysis (risk ratio (RR) 6.76, 95% confidence interval (CI) 5.95, 7.68) and the adjusted analysis RR 3.00, 95% CI 2.01, 4.49); adjusted risk difference 20.3 (95% CI 17.5, 23.1 cases per 1000 livebirths).

conclusionsNAS is an important indicator of the immediate effect of the opioid crisis. This study shows the disparity in NAS by health insurance status for a large rural population in the United States, and its burden on the state's Medicaid programme. Providing timely and accurate estimates of NAS is important for public health policies and decision making.

Indexed as

Neonatal Abstinence SyndromeAnalgesics, OpioidChild, PreschoolHumansIncidenceInfantInfant, NewbornInsurance, HealthMedicaidUnited StatesAnalgesics, OpioidMedicaidneonatal abstinence syndromenon-claims dataWest Virginia

Identifiers

PMID33111385
PMCPMC8386694

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.