Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33111251›Full record

ReviewIrish journal of medical science2021

Recent trends in renal denervation devices for resistant hypertension treatment.

Sumeeyae Haribabu, Faisal Sharif, Haroon Zafar

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Irish journal of medical science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sumeeyae HaribabuCardiovascular Research & Innovation Centre, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland.
Faisal SharifCardiovascular Research & Innovation Centre, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland.
Haroon ZafarCardiovascular Research & Innovation Centre, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland. haroon.zafar@nuigalway.ie.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0300-7446
Ollscoil na Gaillimhe – University of Galway · IE

Funding

Science Foundation Ireland 18/TIDA/6017
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hypertension is one of the most important risk factors for cardiovascular disease, which is the leading cause of mortality. The World Health Organization (WHO) estimated that in 2019 more than 1.13 billion people worldwide were suffering from hypertension. In spite of the advances in new medical therapies, control of hypertension remains suboptimal. Renal denervation (RDN) neuromodulation treatment was primarily developed to treat resistant hypertension and is potentially a new method for treating congestive heart failure, diabetes, and chronic renal failure. RDN consists of passing a catheter into the renal arteries and ablating their sympathetic nerves using radiofrequency or ultrasound energy. Despite promising results in initial trials, RDN failed to achieve its efficacy endpoints as a treatment for resistant hypertension, but the recent series of successful trials show that RDN is back as a serious treatment alternative. This paper reviews the current state-of-the-art RDN devices including Symplicity Flex, Symplicity Spyral, Vessix, EnligHTN, Iberis, TIVUS system, and Paradise. The paper also provides an in-depth review of future RDN devices which include Cryo-RDN, Golden Leaf Catheter, Synaptic, SyMapCath, ConfidenHT System, and Grizzly Microwave Ablation system.

Indexed as

Catheter AblationHypertensionAntihypertensive AgentsBlood PressureHumansKidneyRenal ArterySympathectomyTreatment OutcomeAntihypertensive AgentsMedical devicesRenal denervationResistant hypertensionSympathetic nerves

Identifiers

PMID33111251
OpenAlexW3095559449

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.