ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2021
The contribution of the anthropogenic impact of biomass utilization on ecological degradation: revisiting the G7 economies.
Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dual-function transaminases with hybrid nanoflower for the production of value-added chemicals from biobased levulinic acid.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023Article
- Accounting for the combined impacts of natural resources rent, income level, and energy consumption on environmental quality of G7 economies: a panel quantile regression approach.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2022Article
- The environmental aspects of conventional and clean energy policy in sub-Saharan Africa: is N-shaped hypothesis valid?Environmental science and pollution research international · 2021Article
- How do trade and economic growth impact environmental degradation? New evidence and policy implications from the ARDL approach.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2021Article
- Do international investment contribute to environmental pollution? Evidence from 20 African countries.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2021Review
- Does agricultural development induce environmental pollution in E7? A myth or reality.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2021Article
- Environmental implications of N-shaped environmental Kuznets curve for E7 countries.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The debate on ecological matters that relate to the biomass emissions nexus has gained prominence and different scholars have suggested various forms of policy directions to tackle the menace. This study seeks to contribute to this subject by examining the impact of biomass energy use on carbon dioxide pollution in the G7 economies context. Thus, to this end, we employed energy usage and GDP measured as economic growth which adds factors that can influence pollution for annual time-frequency between1995 and 2016 for the case of G7 economies. The present study adds to the extant literature by the adoption of the novel econometric techniques such as the panel cross-section augment ARDL and common correlated estimate mean group (CCEMG) to evaluate the impact of biomass energy on pollutants. The empirical results from all the techniques show that biomass energy consumption significantly and negatively correlates to CO
Indexed as
Identifiers
33111227What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.