Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33111178›Full record

ArticleBioprocess and biosystems engineering2021

Development of new media formulations for cell culture operations based on regression models.

Mariana Carvalho, Jeremiah Riesberg, Hector Budman

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Bioprocess and biosystems engineering, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mariana CarvalhoChemical Engineering Department, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Canada.
Jeremiah RiesbergMilliporeSigma, A Business of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany, Saint Louis, USA.
Hector BudmanChemical Engineering Department, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Canada. hbudman@uwaterloo.ca.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The paper discusses modelling and optimization of multi-component cell culture medium. The specific productivity (Qp) was considered a function of the medium components and possible interactions described by linear factors, two-way interactions and squared terms that results in a high dimensional problem where the number of variables p (represented by the medium components and their interactions) is much larger than the number of observations n. Principal Components Regression (PCR), Partial Least Squares (PLS), Lasso and Elastic Net regressions were compared as modelling tools to deal with a high dimensional [Formula: see text] problem. PCR and PLS regression models resulted in better prediction results and were used for robust optimization of the medium composition by a nonlinear optimization. The case studies show that it is possible to formulate new media that result in higher Qp than the ones provided by the initial media experiments available. Also, the multivariate statistical approach permitted us to select media that is most informative about the optimum thus permitting modelling and optimization with a reduced set of initial experiments.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsCell Culture TechniquesCulture MediaCulture MediaCell culture mediumD-optimal criteriaMedium formulationMedium optimizationPCRPLS

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.