ArticleSleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung2021
Severity evaluation of obstructive sleep apnea based on speech features.
Article in Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Performance of AI-Based Screening Tools for Obstructive Sleep Apnea Across Apnea-Hypopnea Index Thresholds: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Pooled it
- Awake speech recordings for machine learning diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea: a Bayesian meta-analysis.Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Automatic detection of obstructive sleep apnea based on speech or snoring sounds: a narrative review.Journal of thoracic disease · 2024Review
- Selection of OSA-specific pronunciations and assessment of disease severity assisted by machine learning.Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThere are upper airway abnormalities in patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), and their speech signal characteristics are different from those of unaffected people. In this study, the severity of OSA was evaluated automatically by machine learning technology based on the speech signals of Chinese people.
methodsIn total, 151 adult male Mandarin native speakers who had suspected OSA completed polysomnography to assess the severity of the disease. Chinese vowels and nasal sounds were recorded in sitting and supine positions, and the accuracy of predicting the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) of the participants using a machine learning method was analyzed based on features extracted from the speech signals.
resultsAmong the 151 participants, 75 had AHI > 30 events/h, and 76 had AHI ≤ 30 events/h. Various features including linear prediction cepstral coefficients (LPCC) were extracted from the data collected from participants recorded in the sitting and supine positions and by using a linear support vector machine (SVM); we classified the participants with thresholds of AHI = 30 and AHI = 10 events/h. The accuracies of the classifications were both 78.8%, the sensitivities were 77.3% and 79.1%, and the specificities were 80.3% and 78.0%, respectively.
conclusionThis study constructed a severity evaluation model of OSA based on speech signal processing and machine learning, which can be used as an effective method to screen patients with OSA. In addition, it was found that Chinese pronunciation can be used as an effective feature to predict OSA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.