Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33111163›Full record

ArticleVirchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology2021

Autopsy examination in sudden cardiac death: a current perspective on behalf of the Association for European Cardiovascular Pathology.

Jytte Banner, Cristina Basso, Zoe Tolkien, Ivana Kholova, Katarzyna Michaud, Patrick J Gallagher

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Autopsy of all young sudden death cases is important to increase survival in family members left behind.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2024
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. An updated approach to sudden cardiac death, the AECVP perspective.International journal of legal medicine · 2021
    Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Jytte BannerDepartment of Forensic Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Cristina BassoCardiovascular Pathology Unit, Department of Cardiac, Thoracic and Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
Zoe TolkienNutriDART, Bristol, UK.
Ivana KholovaFimlab Laboratories, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland.
Katarzyna MichaudCentre Universitaire Romand de Médecine Légale, Lausanne, Genève, Switzerland.
Patrick J GallagherMedical Education, Bristol Medical School, Bristol, UK. mdzpxg@bristol.ac.uk.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1313-8984
At Bristol · GBTampere University Hospital · FIUniversity of Copenhagen · DKUniversity of Padua · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In sudden cardiac death, an autopsy is an essential step in establishing a diagnosis of inherited cardiac disease and identifying families that require cardiac screening. To evaluate aspects of post-mortem practice in Europe, a questionnaire was designed and circulated to both clinical and forensic pathologists. There was a 48% response rate and information was obtained from 17 countries. The results showed a wide variety in the management of sudden cardiac death, with a general tendency towards a lack of thorough investigation. In up to 40% of cases, autopsies were not performed in subjects less than 50 years who may have died from cardiac disease. Reasons for this were lack of finance and lack of interest from police, legal authorities, and doctors. Only 50% of pathologists seem to follow a standard protocol for autopsy examination, apparently due to lack of expertise and/or training. When autopsies were performed, histology and toxicology were almost always taken, genetic studies were generally available and retention of the heart for specialist study was usually permitted. Our results suggest that although the standard of practice is appropriate in many centres, many more cases should have autopsies, especially in sudden deaths in subjects less than 50 years.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAutopsyChildChild, PreschoolDeath, Sudden, CardiacEuropeFemaleHealth Care SurveysHumansInfantMaleMiddle AgedPractice Guidelines as TopicAutopsyInherited cardiac conditions—cardiomyopathySudden cardiac death

Identifiers

PMID33111163
PMCPMC7990811
OpenAlexW3095472565

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.