Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33110930›Full record

ArticleGlobal qualitative nursing research

Medical Care-Related Decisions among Patients Diagnosed with Early Stage Malignant Brain Tumor: A Qualitative Study.

Hanako Numata, Maiko Noguchi-Watanabe, Akitake Mukasa, Shota Tanaka, Shunsaku Takayanagi, Nobuhito Saito, Noriko Yamamoto-Mitani

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Global qualitative nursing research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Hanako NumataThe University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7043-0132
Maiko Noguchi-WatanabeThe University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6915-927X
Akitake MukasaThe University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Shota TanakaThe University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Shunsaku TakayanagiThe University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Nobuhito SaitoThe University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Noriko Yamamoto-MitaniThe University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1704-7011

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Medical care-related decision-making among patients with malignant brain tumors has not been sufficiently discussed. This study aimed to develop a framework for understanding patients' experiences in the decision-making process. Semi-structured interviews with 14 patients were analyzed using a grounded theory approach, focusing on their 48 decision-making points. Additionally, interviews with two family members and seven healthcare providers, and participant observations were used to gain contextual insight into patients' experiences. Patients faced decisions while they

Indexed as

Cancergrounded theoryJapanpatient experiencequalitative researchtreatment decision making

Identifiers

PMID33110930
PMCPMC7560538

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.