ArticleJournal of family medicine and primary care2020
A study on diabetic foot ulcers in Central rural India to formulate empiric antimicrobial therapy.
Article in Journal of family medicine and primary care, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prevalence of wound infections and related antimicrobial resistance in Goma, Democratic Republic of the Congo: a multicenter cross-sectional study.BMC infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Healing Outcomes in Diabetic Foot Ulcers Managed Within a Structured Multidisciplinary Care Model: A Retrospective Study.Journal of diabetes research · 2026Article
- Healing or Harming? Navigating Resistance and Rationality in Diabetic Foot Ulcer Antibiotic Therapy: A Retrospective Observational Study.Journal of research in pharmacy practice · 2026Article
- An Update on Diabetic Foot Ulcer and Its Management Modalities.Indian journal of microbiology · 2024Review
- Relative Abundance and Detection ofMicroorganisms · 2023Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimThis study was carried out on patients with diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) to assess the clinical characteristics, spectrum of microbial flora, antibiotic sensitivity, and devise an empiric antimicrobial therapy. MATERIAL
methodsClinical data and tissue samples were collected from 105 diabetic foot ulcer patients between December 2018 and November 2019. The collected samples were processed as per Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines and clinical and microbiological data was analyzed.
resultsIn this study of 105 patients, DFU was most common in males in 5
conclusionThis study showed DFU are common in 5
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.