ArticleJournal of family medicine and primary care2020
Fine-needle aspiration cytology of mediastinal masses: An institutional experience.
Article in Journal of family medicine and primary care, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionMediastinal masses are uncommon in clinical practice. Fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) is an important and useful investigation and is considered next to imaging in the diagnosis of mediastinal lesions.
aimTo analyze the mediastinal masses diagnosed on FNAC. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe retrospectively retrieved twenty-five cases, which underwent FNAC under ultrasound or computed tomography (CT) guidance for mediastinal masses, over a period of 4 years. Histopathological correlations were done in cases wherever available.
resultsAmong twenty-five cases, which were diagnosed through FNAC, eighteen were males and seven were females with age ranging from 6 to 85 years. Ultrasonography (USG)-guided FNAC was performed in three patients, while CT-guided FNAC was performed in twenty-two patients. Out of twenty-five cases, seventeen cases were malignant, six were benign, and two cases were inadequate. FNAC was useful in the diagnosis of 83.3% of cases. Biopsy and/or cell block correlations were available in fourteen cases. In the malignant category, mediastinal invasion by either squamous cell carcinoma or adenocarcinoma constituted the highest number with eight (47%) out of seventeen cases. Among the nonneoplastic conditions, nonspecific inflammation was the most common cause with two cases (8%) out of total cases followed by one case each of tuberculosis, schwannoma, thymoma, and cystic lesion.
conclusionUSG or CT-guided FNAC is a safe, minimally invasive, and cost-effective procedure, which can provide a precise diagnosis in the mediastinal masses, and may obviate the need for an invasive surgical approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.