Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33110631›Full record

ArticleAdvances in simulation (London, England)2020

Midwifery students better approximate their self-efficacy in clinical lactation after reflecting in and on their performance in the LactSim OSCE.

Aria Grabowski, Olivia S Anderson, Ruth Zielinski, Melisa Scott, Lisa Hammer, Muriel Bassil, Samantha A Chuisano, Anna Sadovnikova

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in simulation (London, England), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Aria Grabowski *Department of Nutritional Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA.
Olivia S Anderson *Department of Nutritional Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA.
Ruth ZielinskiSchool of Nursing, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA.
Melisa ScottUniversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA.
Lisa HammerDepartment of Nutritional Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA.
Muriel BassilDepartment of Nutritional Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA.
Samantha A ChuisanoLiquidGoldConcept, Inc., Ypsilanti, USA.
Anna SadovnikovaLiquidGoldConcept, Inc., Ypsilanti, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMidwives are expected to support women with lactation initiation and maintenance. Midwifery students engaged in a simulation-based exercise (LactSim OSCE) where they role-played the clinician and the breastfeeding patient by wearing a high-fidelity breast model. We provided participants opportunities for reflecting in and on practice to compare their perceived self-confidence in clinical lactation skills to actual clinical performance. We also describe feasibility of implementing the LactSim OSCE with an emphasis on preparation and time spent on tasks during the OSCE.

methodsAudio-video recordings from the LactSim OSCE were viewed and assessed using a technical skills checklist by an independent rater and by the study participants as part of the self-reflection. Mixed data on participants' self-efficacy in clinical lactation, experience with the LactSim OSCE, and self-assessment of clinical performance were collected in survey instruments and a focus group. Time spent on each component and clinical lactation skill during the LactSim OSCE was documented.

resultsImmediately following the LactSim OSCE, participants' confidence in clinical lactation was high (5.7/7), but after a guided video reflection exercise, their self-efficacy was 4.4/7. Participants spent approximately 2 of the allotted 10 min per case scenario discussing the OSCE logistics due to inadequate preparation. Participants spent approximately 2 min of the total encounter performing hands-on clinical lactation skills by touching, looking at, or using the high-fidelity breast model worn by their peer.

conclusionWe described the development and evaluation of the first simulated experience in clinical lactation with all three components of fidelity: conceptual, psychological, and physical. Multiple opportunities for reflecting on performance allowed the nurse-midwifery students to evaluate their competence in decision-making, technical, and counseling skills which resulted in a more realistic approximation of their perceived self-confidence in breastfeeding skills. Another innovation of this pilot work is the documentation of how long a learner spends on various tasks relevant to lactation support in a simulated encounter. Our findings highlight the importance of providing multiple opportunities for self-reflection using guided video reflection and checklists for objective self-assessment in the clinical lactation field.

Indexed as

AbbreviationsBreastfeeding educationHigh-fidelity simulationIBCLC International Board-Certified Lactation ConsultantLactation simulation modelLactSim Lactation simulationLSM Lactation simulation modelMidwifery educationObserved structured clinical examinationOSCE Objective structured clinical examSelf-reflection

Identifiers

PMID33110631
PMCPMC7583289

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.