ArticlePilot and feasibility studies2020
Examining recruitment feasibility and related outcomes in adults post-stroke.
Article in Pilot and feasibility studies, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02277028 (A Comparison of Two Types of Priming for Upper Extremity Hemiparesis), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Comparison of Two Types of Priming for Upper Extremity Hemiparesis
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comorbidity patterns and mortality in HFpEF: A retrospective longitudinal cohort study.International journal of cardiology. Cardiovascular risk and prevention · 2025Article
- The feasibility and acceptability of an app-based cognitive strategy training programme for older people.Pilot and feasibility studies · 2023Article
- Herbal MedicineInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThere are limited effective and evidence-based interventions for upper extremity hemiparesis post-stroke. To prepare for an RCT and minimize misuse of resources, there is value in conducting a feasibility study.
objectiveTo examine the feasibility of recruitment and other related outcomes for an intense upper limb intervention. METHODOLOGY: Feasibility outcomes included retention, adherence, accrual rate, sample characteristics, and identification of productive recruitment methods. Other outcomes included satisfaction with the study, fidelity, and equipoise of both staff and participants.
resultsParticipants were enrolled at a rate of 1.33 per month. The recruitment timeline had to be extended by 4 months, to meet the target of 16 randomized participants. Staggered recruitment was the most successful strategy. We found that following up with individuals who missed initial appointments prior to study enrollment led to decreased adherence.
conclusionIt is feasible to recruit and retain post-stroke participants for an intense intervention study.
trial registrationNCT02277028.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.