Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33110571›Full record

ArticleJournal of global health2020

Precision-weighted estimates of neonatal, post-neonatal and child mortality for 640 districts in India, National Family Health Survey 2016.

Rockli Kim, Lathan Liou, Yun Xu, Rakesh Kumar, George Leckie, Mudit Kapoor, R Venkataramanan, Alok Kumar, William Joe, S V Subramanian

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of global health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Rockli KimDivision of Health Policy & Management, College of Health Science, Korea University, Seoul, South Korea.
Lathan LiouDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Yun XuSuperMap Software Co. Ltd, Beijing, China.
Rakesh KumarTata Trusts, Mumbai, India.
George LeckieCentre for Multilevel Modelling, University of Bristol, UK.
Mudit KapoorEconomic and Planning Unit, Indian Statistical Institute (ISI), New Delhi, India.
R VenkataramananUniversity of Warwick, Coventry, England.
Alok KumarMedical Health & Family Welfare Department, Government of Uttar Pradesh, Lucknow, India.
William JoeInstitute of Economic Growth (IEG), University of Delhi Enclave, Delhi, India.
S V SubramanianHarvard Center for Population & Development Studies, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe conventional indicators of infant and under-five mortality are aggregate deaths occurring in the first year and the first five years, respectively. Monitoring deaths by <1 month (neonatal), 1-11 months (post-neonatal), and 12-59 months (child) can be more informative given various etiological causes that may require different interventions across these three mutually exclusive periods. For optimal resource allocation, it is also necessary to track progress in robust estimates of child survival at a smaller geographic and administrative level.

methodsData on 259 627 children came from the 2015-2016 Indian National Family Health Survey. We used a random effects model to account for the complex survey design and sampling variability, and predicted district-specific probabilities of neonatal, post-neonatal, and child mortality. The resulting precision-weighted estimates are more reliable as they pool information and borrow strength from other districts that share the same state membership. The Pearson correlation and Spearman's rank correlation were assessed for the three mortality estimates, and the Moran's I measure was used to detect spatial clustering of high burden districts for each outcome.

resultsThe majority of under-five deaths was disproportionately concentrated in the neonatal period. Across all districts, the predicted probability of neonatal, post-neonatal, and child mortality varied from 6.0 to 63.9 deaths, 3.8 to 47.6 deaths, and 1.7 to 11.8 deaths per 1000 live births, respectively. The overall correlation between district-wide probabilities of mortality for the three mutually exclusive periods was moderate (Pearson correlation = 0.47-0.58, Spearman's rank correlation = 0.58-0.64). For each outcome, a relatively strong spatial clustering was detected across districts that transcended state boundaries (Moran's I = 0.61-0.76).

conclusionsSufficiently breaking down the under-five mortality to distinct age groups and using the precision-weighted estimations to monitor performances at smaller geographic and administrative units can inform more targeted interventions and foster accountability to improve child survival.

Indexed as

Child MortalityInfant MortalityChild, PreschoolHealth SurveysHumansIndiaInfantInfant, Newborn

Identifiers

PMID33110571
PMCPMC7568918

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.