ArticleJournal of healthcare engineering2020
Hybrid Model Structure for Diabetic Retinopathy Classification.
Article in Journal of healthcare engineering, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- A deep learning based model for diabetic retinopathy grading.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Identification of diabetic retinopathy lesions in fundus images by integrating CNN and vision mamba models.PloS one · 2025Article
- SwAV-driven diagnostics: new perspectives on grading diabetic retinopathy from retinal photography.Frontiers in robotics and AI · 2024Article
- Lesion classification and diabetic retinopathy grading by integrating softmax and pooling operators into vision transformer.Frontiers in public health · 2024Article
- Hybrid Methods for Fundus Image Analysis for Diagnosis of Diabetic Retinopathy Development Stages Based on Fusion Features.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- DR-NASNet: Automated System to Detect and Classify Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Using Improved Pretrained NASNet Model.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Enhancement of Diabetic Retinopathy Prognostication Using Deep Learning, CLAHE, and ESRGAN.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Article
- Deep Learning-Based Prediction of Diabetic Retinopathy Using CLAHE and ESRGAN for Enhancement.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- A hybrid neural network approach for classifying diabetic retinopathy subtypes.Frontiers in medicine · 2023Article
- Research progress in artificial intelligence assisted diabetic retinopathy diagnosis.International journal of ophthalmology · 2023Article
- Gray wolf optimization-extreme learning machine approach for diabetic retinopathy detection.Frontiers in public health · 2022Article
- A Novel Extra Tree Ensemble Optimized DL Framework (ETEODL) for Early Detection of Diabetes.Frontiers in public health · 2021Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is one of the most common complications of diabetes and the main cause of blindness. The progression of the disease can be prevented by early diagnosis of DR. Due to differences in the distribution of medical conditions and low labor efficiency, the best time for diagnosis and treatment was missed, which results in impaired vision. Using neural network models to classify and diagnose DR can improve efficiency and reduce costs. In this work, an improved loss function and three hybrid model structures Hybrid-a, Hybrid-f, and Hybrid-c were proposed to improve the performance of DR classification models. EfficientNetB4, EfficientNetB5, NASNetLarge, Xception, and InceptionResNetV2 CNNs were chosen as the basic models. These basic models were trained using enhance cross-entropy loss and cross-entropy loss, respectively. The output of the basic models was used to train the hybrid model structures. Experiments showed that enhance cross-entropy loss can effectively accelerate the training process of the basic models and improve the performance of the models under various evaluation metrics. The proposed hybrid model structures can also improve DR classification performance. Compared with the best-performing results in the basic models, the accuracy of DR classification was improved from 85.44% to 86.34%, the sensitivity was improved from 98.48% to 98.77%, the specificity was improved from 71.82% to 74.76%, the precision was improved from 90.27% to 91.37%, and the F1 score was improved from 93.62% to 93.9% by using hybrid model structures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.