ArticleScientific reports2020
Reliability of quantitative transverse relaxation time mapping with [Formula: see text]-prepared whole brain pCASL.
Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Aberrant pattern of regional cerebral blood flow in mild cognitive impairment: A meta-analysis of arterial spin labeling magnetic resonance imaging.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2022Pooled it
- Seminars in epileptology: Presurgical epilepsy evaluation.Epileptic disorders : international epilepsy journal with videotape · 2025Review
- Cerebral perfusion correlates with amyloid deposition in patients with mild cognitive impairment due to Alzheimer's disease.The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease · 2025Article
- In vivo methods for imaging blood-brain barrier function and dysfunction.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2023Review
- The neurovasculature as a target in temporal lobe epilepsy.Brain pathology (Zurich, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Effects of Mind-Body Exercise on Brain Structure and Function: A Systematic Review on MRI Studies.Brain sciences · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Arterial spin labeling (ASL) is increasingly applied for cerebral blood flow mapping, but [Formula: see text] relaxation of the ASL signal magnetization is often ignored, although it may be clinically relevant. To investigate the extent, to which quantitative [Formula: see text] values in gray matter (GM) obtained by pseudocontinuous ASL (pCASL) perfusion MRI can be reproduced, are reliable and a potential neuroscientific biomarker, a prospective study was performed with ten healthy volunteers (5F,28 ± 3y) at a 3 T scanner. A [Formula: see text]-prepared pCASL sequence enabled the measurement of quantitative [Formula: see text] and perfusion maps. [Formula: see text] times were modeled per voxel and analyzed within four GM-regions-of-interest (ROI). The intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) of the quantified ASL-[Formula: see text] varied across brain regions. When averaged across subjects and postlabeling delays (PLDs), the ICCs ranged from reasonable values in parietal regions (ICC = 0.56) to smaller values in frontal regions (ICC = 0.36). Corresponding subject-averaged within-subject coefficients of variation (WSCVs) showed good test-retest measurement precision ([Formula: see text] for all PLDs), but more pronounced inter-subject variance. Reliability and precision of quantified ASL-[Formula: see text] were region-, PLD- and subject-specific, showing fair to robust results in occipital, parietal and temporal ROIs. The results give rise to consider the method for future cerebral studies, where variable perfusion or altered [Formula: see text] times are suspected.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.