Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33110153›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

Population genomics reveals lack of greater white-fronted introgression into the Swedish lesser white-fronted goose.

David Díez-Del-Molino, Johanna von Seth, Niclas Gyllenstrand, Fredrik Widemo, Niklas Liljebäck, Mikael Svensson, Per Sjögren-Gulve, Love Dalén

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

David Díez-Del-MolinoDepartment of Bioinformatics and Genetics, Swedish Museum of Natural History, Box 50007, 10405, Stockholm, Sweden. diez.molino@gmail.com.
Johanna von SethDepartment of Bioinformatics and Genetics, Swedish Museum of Natural History, Box 50007, 10405, Stockholm, Sweden.
Niclas GyllenstrandCentre for Genetic Identification, Department of Environmental Research and Monitoring, Swedish Museum of Natural History, Box 50007, 10405, Stockholm, Sweden.
Fredrik WidemoDepartment of Wildlife, Fish and Environmental Studies, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, 90183, Umeå, Sweden.
Niklas LiljebäckGrimsö Wildlife Research Station, Department of Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, 73091, Riddarhyttan, Sweden.
Mikael SvenssonSwedish Species Information Centre, SLU ArtDatabanken, Box 7007, 750 07, Uppsala, Sweden.
Per Sjögren-GulveThe Wildlife Analysis Unit, Swedish Environmental Protection Agency, 106 48, Stockholm, Sweden.
Love DalénDepartment of Bioinformatics and Genetics, Swedish Museum of Natural History, Box 50007, 10405, Stockholm, Sweden. love.dalen@nrm.se.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Interspecific introgression is considered a potential threat to endangered taxa. One example where this has had a major impact on conservation policy is the lesser white-fronted goose (LWfG). After a dramatic decline in Sweden, captive breeding birds were released between 1981-1999 with the aim to reinforce the population. However, the detection of greater white-fronted goose (GWfG) mitochondrial DNA in the LWfG breeding stock led to the release program being dismantled, even though the presence of GWfG introgression in the actual wild Swedish LWfG population was never documented. To examine this, we sequenced the complete genomes of 21 LWfG birds from the Swedish, Russian and Norwegian populations, and compared these with genomes from other goose species, including the GWfG. We found no evidence of interspecific introgression into the wild Swedish LWfG population in either nuclear genomic or mitochondrial data. Moreover, Swedish LWfG birds are genetically distinct from the Russian and Norwegian populations and display comparatively low genomic diversity and high levels of inbreeding. Our findings highlight the utility of genomic approaches in providing scientific evidence that can help improve conservation management as well as policies for breeding and reinforcement programmes.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnimals, WildBreedingConservation of Natural ResourcesDNA, MitochondrialFemaleGeeseGenetic IntrogressionGenetics, PopulationGenomeMaleSwedenDNA, Mitochondrial

Identifiers

PMID33110153
PMCPMC7591532

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.