ArticleScientific reports2020
Vaginal microbiota evaluation and prevalence of key pathogens in ecuadorian women: an epidemiologic analysis.
Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
35 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 56 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prevalence of Five Clinically Relevant Genital Microorganisms Among Women in South America, 2014-2024: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Pooled it
- Alterations in gut and genital microbiota associated with gynecological diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E · 2024Pooled it
- Exploratory randomized open-label clinical trial ofFrontiers in medicine · 2026Trial
- Evaluation of the quality of vaginal discharge smear analysis reporting in five clinical laboratories in the Colombian Pacific RegionBiomedica : revista del Instituto Nacional de Salud · 2026Article
- Cell-Free but potent: Antimicrobial potential of Lactobacillus supernatants against multidrug-resistant pathogens.PloS one · 2026Article
- Preliminary investigation of changes in pathogen presence in the vaginal microbiome in association with age.Iranian journal of microbiology · 2025Article
- Vaginal-spray Bacillus spore probiotics as a potential treatment and reducing recurrence of bacterial vaginosis: randomized, double-blind, and controlled pilot study.Communications medicine · 2025Article
- Aetiology of Vulvovaginal Candidiasis in Ecuador and In Vitro Antifungal Activity AgainstJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Impact of Biofilm Formation by VaginalJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Insights into the alteration of vaginal microbiota and metabolites in pregnant woman with preterm delivery: prospective cohort study.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025Article
- Article
- From plants to particles: herbal solutions and nanotechnology combating resistant vulvovaginal candidiasis.Therapeutic delivery · 2024Review
- Cervicovaginal microbiota: a promising direction for prevention and treatment in cervical cancer.Infectious agents and cancer · 2024Review
- Effect of stress urinary incontinence on vaginal microbial communities.BMC microbiology · 2024Article
- Vaginal microbiomes of breast cancer survivors treated with aromatase inhibitors with and without vulvovaginal symptoms.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Association between bacterial vaginosis with human papillomavirus in the United States (NHANES 2003-2004).BMC women's health · 2024Article
- A non-antibiotic antimicrobial drug, a biological bacteriostatic agent, is useful for treating aerobic vaginitis, bacterial vaginosis, and vulvovaginal candidiasis.Frontiers in microbiology · 2024Article
- Article
- Microbiota changes: the unseen players in cervical cancer progression.Frontiers in microbiology · 2024Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Vaginal infection is a gynecological problem in women of reproductive age with multiple health outcomes. The most common forms of infection include bacterial vaginosis (BV), vulvovaginal candidiasis (VC), and aerobic vaginitis (AV). Our main goals were to evaluate different types of vaginal infections in Ecuadorian women in a large urban area (Quito) and to characterize the vaginal microbiota colonization by opportunistic species. We collected vaginal swabs and epidemiological surveys from 414 women from June 2016 to July of 2017. We analyzed vaginal samples for the presence of any vaginal infection. The microbiological examination was done through Gram-stain, wet mount smears, and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays using primers for target genes, such as 16S rRNA (Atopobium vaginae, Mobiluncus mulieris, and Gardnerella species), ddl (Enterococcus faecalis), adk (Escherichia coli) and KER1 (Candida albicans) genes. Most women showed a healthy vaginal microbiota (66.7%). Nearly one-tenth (10.4%) of the participants had intermediate microbiota, and the remaining women (22.9%) had a single vaginal infection (BV, AV, or VC) or coinfections. From the 95 participants that had an infection, AV was the main diagnosed vaginal infection (51.6%), followed by BV (24.2%) and finally VC (7.4%). The remaining women (16.8%) showed coinfections, being BV and AV the most common coinfection. Using univariable logistic regression analyses we found an increased odds of healthy microbiota in women with a sexual partner (P = 0.02, OR = 1.64). Also, women in a free union relationship (P = 0.000, OR = 16.65) had an increased odds of having coinfections. On the other hand, the use of birth control (condom OR = 0.388 or other contraceptive method OR = 0.363) was associated with significantly lower odds of intermediate microbiota (P ≤ 0.05). We found no statistically significant differences between women with infection and a particular group age. Using multivariate logistic regression analyses we initially found an increased odds of having BV in women with M. mulieris (P = 0.020, OR = 4.98) and Gardnerella species (P = 0.010, OR = 4.16). Women with E. coli showed an increased odds of having AV (P = 0.009, OR = 2.81). The presence of C. albicans in women showed an increased odds of having VC (P = 0.007, OR = 17.94). Finally, women with M. mulieris showed a reverse odds of having healthy microbiota (P = 0.008, OR = 0.06). We found no statistically significant differences between women with symptomatic and asymptomatic infections or the presence of Enterococcus faecalis. We found using logistic regression analyses that M. mulieris was the most prevalent opportunistic pathogen among women with vaginal infection. Further studies should evaluate the possibility to use M. mulieris as a potential key predictor for vaginal infections.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.