Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33110065›Full record

ReviewNature communications2020

Towards a global-scale soil climate mitigation strategy.

W Amelung, D Bossio, W de Vries, I Kögel-Knabner, J Lehmann, R Amundson, R Bol, C Collins, R Lal, J Leifeld and 10 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature communications, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

W AmelungInstitute of Crop Science and Resource Conservation - Soil Science and Soil Ecology, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany. wulf.amelung@uni-bonn.de.ORCID 0000-0002-4920-4667
D BossioThe Nature Conservancy, Arlington, VA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2296-9125
W de VriesWageningen, University and Research, Environmental Research, 6700 AA, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
I Kögel-KnabnerChair of Soil Science, Department of Ecology and Ecosystem Management and Institute of Advanced Study (TUM-IAS), Technische Universität München, München, Germany.
J LehmannSoil and Crop Science, School of Integrative Plant Science Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4701-2936
R AmundsonDepartment of Environmental Science, Policy, and Management, University of California, Berkeley, CA, 94720, USA.
R BolInstitute of Bio-and Geosciences, Agrosphere (IBG3), Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Jülich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3015-7706
C CollinsDepartment of Geography and Environmental Science, University of Reading, Reading, UK.
R LalCarbon Management and Sequestration Center, CFAES/SENR, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9016-2972
J LeifeldAgroscope, Climate and Agriculture Group, 8046, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-7245-9852
B MinasnySchool of Life and Environmental Sciences, Sydney Institute of Agriculture, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, 2006, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1182-2371
G PanInstitute of Resources, Ecosystem and Environment of Agriculture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, 210095, China.
K PaustianDepartment of Soil and Crop Sciences and Natural Resource Ecology Lab, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA.
C RumpelCNRS, Institute for Ecology and Environmental Sciences (IEES) Paris, Paris, France.
J SandermanWoodwell Climate Research Center, Falmouth, MA, 02540, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3215-1706
J W van GroenigenSoil Biology Group, Wageningen University, 6700 AA, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
S MooneyO'Neill School of Public and Environmental Affairs, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3138-0355
B van WesemaelEarth and Life Institute, Université catholique de Louvain, Louvain La Neuve, Belgium.
M WanderNatural Resources and Environmental Sciences, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign College of Agriculture, Consumer and Environmental Sciences, Urbana, IL, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6145-1580
A ChabbiInstitut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement (INRAE) Centre de Recherche Nouvelle-Aquitaine-Poitiers, (URP3F), Lusignan, France. abad.chabbi@inrae.fr.ORCID 0000-0002-6567-4562

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sustainable soil carbon sequestration practices need to be rapidly scaled up and implemented to contribute to climate change mitigation. We highlight that the major potential for carbon sequestration is in cropland soils, especially those with large yield gaps and/or large historic soil organic carbon losses. The implementation of soil carbon sequestration measures requires a diverse set of options, each adapted to local soil conditions and management opportunities, and accounting for site-specific trade-offs. We propose the establishment of a soil information system containing localised information on soil group, degradation status, crop yield gap, and the associated carbon-sequestration potentials, as well as the provision of incentives and policies to translate management options into region- and soil-specific practices.

Identifiers

PMID33110065
PMCPMC7591914

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.