Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33109924›Full record

SynthesisEuropean journal of anaesthesiology2020

Fluid loading therapy to prevent spinal hypotension in women undergoing elective caesarean section: Network meta-analysis, trial sequential analysis and meta-regression.

Koen Rijs, Frédéric J Mercier, D Nuala Lucas, Rolf Rossaint, Markus Klimek, Michael Heesen

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readSystematic ReviewNetwork Meta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European journal of anaesthesiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05348980 (Comparison of Two Different Doses of Intramuscular Phenylephrine HCL for Prevention of Spinal Anesthesia Induced Hypotension During Cesarean Section), which is not on this map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05348980 phase4completednot on this map

Comparison of Two Different Doses of Intramuscular Phenylephrine HCL for Prevention of Spinal Anesthesia Induced Hypotension During Cesarean Section: A Prospective Randomized Double-blinded Parallel Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorRehman Medical Institute - RMIRan2020 to 2020Enrolled60ConditionsHypotension, AnesthesiaArmsPhenylephrine Hydrochloride 4 mg, Phenylephrine Hydrochloride 8 mg
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Prevention of hypotension after neuraxial anesthesia in nonobstetric surgery: a systematic review.Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Interpretation of meta-analyses.Interventional pain medicine · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 5 countries.

Koen RijsFrom the Department of Anaesthesia, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands (KR, MK), the Department of Anaesthesia, Hôpital Antoine Béclère, GHU AP-HP. Université Paris-Saclay, Clamart, France (FJM), the Department of Anaesthesia, Northwick Park Hospital, Harrow, UK (DNL), the Department of Anaesthesia, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany (RR), and the Department of Anaesthesia, Kantonsspital Baden, Baden, Switzerland (MH).
Frédéric J Mercier
D Nuala Lucas
Rolf Rossaint
Markus Klimek
Michael Heesen
Hôpital Antoine-Béclère · FRKantonsspital Baden · CHRWTH Aachen University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFluid loading is one of the recognised measures to prevent hypotension due to spinal anaesthesia in women scheduled for a caesarean section.

objectiveWe aimed to evaluate the current evidence on fluid loading in the prevention of spinal anaesthesia-induced hypotension.

designSystematic review and network meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis and meta-regression. DATA SOURCES: Medline, Epub, Embase.com (Embase and Medline), Cochrane Central, Web of Science and Google Scholar were used. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Only randomised controlled trials were used. Patients included women undergoing elective caesarean section who received either crystalloid or colloid fluid therapy as a preload or coload. The comparator was a combination of either a different fluid or time of infusion.

resultsA total of 49 studies (4317 patients) were included. Network meta-analysis concluded that colloid coload and preload offered the highest chance of success (97 and 67%, respectively). Conventional meta-analysis showed that crystalloid preload is associated with a significantly higher incidence of maternal hypotension than colloid preload: risk ratio 1.48 (95% CI 1.29 to 1.69, P < 0.0001, I = 60%). However, this result was not supported by Trial Sequential Analysis. There was a significant dose-response effect for crystalloid volume preload (regression coefficient = -0.073), which was not present in the analysis of only double-blind studies. There was no dose-response effect for the other fluid regimes.

conclusionUnlike previous meta-analysies, we found a lack of data obviating an evidence-based recommendation. In most studies, vasopressors were not given prophylactically as is recommended. Studies on the best fluid regimen in combination with prophylactic vasopressors are needed. Due to official european usage restrictions on the most studied colloid (HES), we recommend crystalloid coload as the most appropriate fluid regimen.

trial registrationCRD42018099347.

Indexed as

Anesthesia, ObstetricalAnesthesia, SpinalHypotensionCesarean SectionFemaleFluid TherapyHumansIsotonic SolutionsPregnancyRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicIsotonic Solutions

Identifiers

PMID33109924
PMCPMC7752245
OpenAlexW3096927032

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.