Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33109798›Full record

Observational studyAnnals of cardiac anaesthesia

Comparison of flow-independent parameters for grading severity of aortic stenosis using intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography - A prospective observational study.

S Nanditha, Vishwas Malik

Open access · diamondAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Annals of cardiac anaesthesia. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 79% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

S NandithaDepartment of Cardiac Anesthesia, Aster CMI, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Vishwas MalikDepartment of Cardiac Anesthesia, AIIMS, Ansari Nagar, New Delhi, India.
ASTER · CANational Institute of Medical Statistics · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Discrepancies have been reported in grading of severity of aortic stenosis. We propose to compare Aortic valve area by continuity equation, Dimensionless Index and Acceleration time/Ejection time in patients with documented severe aortic stenosis with normal left ventricular function by TEE after induction of anesthesia. This might give use insight about the best parameter we can rely on intra-operatively for decision making. Methodology: 60 patients with severe AS undergoing elective cardiac surgery were enrolled in our study. Post intubation trans-thoracic echocardiography (TEE) was performed and above mentioned parameters was noted. Results: 96.7 % of patients continued in severe AS category when AS was measured using AVA as echo parameter. So there is 3.3 % disparity. There was disparity in 13.3% of cases when DI was considered. And there was 43.3% disparity when AT/ET was considered. Conclusion: Perioperative grading of aortic stenosis continues to be a challenge for cardiac anesthesiologists. Multiple echocardiographic parameters have to be considered. We have found AVA and DI to have less disparity compared to AT/ET.

Indexed as

Aortic Valve StenosisEchocardiography, TransesophagealAortic ValveEchocardiographyHumansMaleProspective StudiesSeverity of Illness IndexAcceleration time/ejection timeaortic stenosisdimensionless index

Identifiers

PMID33109798
PMCPMC7879882
OpenAlexW3093702897

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.