Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33109741›Full record

ArticleClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2021

Development and Validation of a Gene Signature Classifier for Consensus Molecular Subtyping of Colorectal Carcinoma in a CLIA-Certified Setting.

Jeffrey S Morris, Rajyalakshmi Luthra, Yusha Liu, Dzifa Y Duose, Wonyul Lee, Neelima G Reddy, Justin Windham, Huiqin Chen, Zhimin Tong, Baili Zhang and 15 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Clinical Challenges of Consensus Molecular Subtype CMS4 Colon Cancer in the Era of Precision Medicine.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2024
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. CINSARC signature outperforms gold-standard TNM staging and consensus molecular subtypes for clinical outcome in stage II-III colorectal carcinoma.Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Jeffrey S MorrisDepartment of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.ORCID 0000-0002-4911-2252
Rajyalakshmi LuthraDivision of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Yusha LiuDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Chicago School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois.
Dzifa Y DuoseDivision of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Wonyul LeeDepartment of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Neelima G ReddyDivision of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Justin WindhamNanoString Technologies Inc., Seattle, Washington.ORCID 0000-0002-1090-2484
Huiqin ChenDepartment of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Zhimin TongDivision of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Baili ZhangDivision of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Wei WeiCleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio.ORCID 0000-0002-0960-7269
Manyam GanirajuDepartment of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Bradley M BroomDepartment of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.ORCID 0000-0002-0915-3164
Hector A AlvarezDivision of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Alicia MejiaDivision of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Omkara VeerankiDivision of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Mark J RoutbortDivision of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.ORCID 0000-0003-4860-261X
Van K MorrisDepartment of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.ORCID 0000-0002-4911-2252
Michael J OvermanDepartment of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.ORCID 0000-0001-5377-135X
David MenterDepartment of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Riham KatkhudaDepartment of Pathology, University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois.
Ignacio I WistubaDivision of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Jennifer S DavisDepartment of Epidemiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.ORCID 0000-0001-9456-1682
Scott Kopetz *Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Dipen M Maru *Division of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas. dmaru@mdanderson.org.ORCID 0000-0002-9134-7709
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USCleveland Clinic · USNanostring Technologies (United States) · USUniversity of Chicago Medical Center · USUniversity of Illinois Chicago · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Fabien Delerue · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
Project 3: Inhibiting Oxidative Phosphorylation in Pancreatic CancerP50CA221707 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI KOPETZ, SCOTT, MAITRA, ANIRBAN · 2019 to 2023
$11.0M
Bayesian methods for complex, high-dimensional functional data in cancer researchR01CA178744 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI MORRIS, JEFFREY S · 2015 to 2019
$1.7M
Colorectal Cancer Molecular Subtype Assay Development and ValidationUH3CA207101 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI KOPETZ, SCOTT, LUTHRA, RAJYALAKSHMI · 2021 to 2023
$788k
Colorectal Cancer Molecular Subtype Assay Development and ValidationUH2CA207101 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI KOPETZ, SCOTT, LUTHRA, RAJYALAKSHMI · 2018 to 2019
$378k
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672NCI NIH HHS P50 CA221707NCI NIH HHS R01 CA178744NCI NIH HHS UH2 CA207101NCI NIH HHS UH3 CA207101
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeConsensus molecular subtyping (CMS) of colorectal cancer has potential to reshape the colorectal cancer landscape. We developed and validated an assay that is applicable on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) samples of colorectal cancer and implemented the assay in a Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA)-certified laboratory. EXPERIMENTAL

designWe performed an

resultsThe best classifier was weighted support vector machine with high accuracy across platforms and gene lists (>0.95), and the 472-gene model outperforming existing classifiers. We constructed subsets of 99 and 200 genes with high FF/FFPE concordance, and adapted FFPE-based classifier that had strong classification accuracy (>80%) relative to "gold standard" CMS. The classifier was reproducible to sample type and RNA quality, and demonstrated poor prognosis for CMS1-3 and good prognosis for CMS2 in metastatic colorectal cancer (

conclusionsWe developed and validated a colorectal cancer CMS assay that is ready for use in clinical trials, to assess prognosis in standard-of-care settings and explore as predictor of therapy response.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticSupport Vector MachineAntineoplastic AgentsBiomarkers, TumorColorectal NeoplasmsDrug Resistance, NeoplasmFemaleGene Expression ProfilingHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisReproducibility of ResultsRisk AssessmentTranscriptomeAntineoplastic AgentsBiomarkers, Tumor

Identifiers

PMID33109741
PMCPMC8713413
OpenAlexW3096720134

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.