Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33109706›Full record

Trial reportJournal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry2021

Clinical staging in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: analysis of Edaravone Study 19.

Ammar Al-Chalabi, Adriano Chiò, Charlotte Merrill, Gerry Oster, Rebecca Bornheimer, Wendy Agnese, Stephen Apple

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Ferroptosis: underlying mechanisms and involvement in neurodegenerative diseases.Apoptosis : an international journal on programmed cell death · 2024
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Ammar Al-ChalabiDepartment of Basic and Clinical Neuroscience, Maurice Wohl Clinical Neuroscience Institute, King's College London, London, UK.
Adriano Chiò"Rita Levi Montalcini" Department of Neurosciences, ALS Centre, University of Turin and Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy.
Charlotte MerrillMitsubishi Tanabe Pharma America, Inc, Jersey City, New Jersey, USA.
Gerry OsterPolicy Analysis Inc, Brookline, Massachusetts, USA.
Rebecca BornheimerPolicy Analysis Inc, Brookline, Massachusetts, USA.
Wendy AgneseMitsubishi Tanabe Pharma America, Inc, Jersey City, New Jersey, USA.
Stephen AppleMitsubishi Tanabe Pharma America, Inc, Jersey City, New Jersey, USA stephen_apple@mt-pharma-us.com.
Mitsubishi Corporation (United States) · USPolicy Analysis (United States) · USAzienda Ospedaliera Citta' della Salute e della Scienza di Torino · ITKing's College London · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/L501529/1Medical Research Council MR/R024804/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis was a post hoc analysis of the Edaravone Phase III Study MCI186-19 ('Study 19') to examine the utility of clinical staging systems as end points in clinical trials in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS).

methodsAmyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale-Revised item scores from Study 19 were retrospectively mapped to King's stage and Milano-Torino staging (MiToS) stage. We assessed the percentage of patients who experienced progression in King's and MiToS stages during Study 19. We also assessed disease progression in subgroups of patients according to baseline King's stage.

resultsDuring double-blind treatment, the percentage of patients who experienced a progression in King's stage was lower for edaravone (42.0%, 95% CI 30.4% to 53.6%) than placebo (55.9%, 95% CI 44.1% to 67.6%). The most pronounced effect was noted among patients who were in stage 1 and was maintained throughout open-label treatment. An analysis of a ≥2-stage progression in MiToS stage showed no difference between treatment arms during double-blind treatment, but during the open-label period, more rapid progression was noted among patients in the placebo-edaravone arm than among those in the edaravone-edaravone arm (log-rank test, p<0.001).

conclusionsThe King's and MiToS staging systems provided utility in assessing clinical progression in Edaravone Study 19. These findings may support the use of staging systems as end points in ALS clinical trials and to understand the timing of benefit as measured by these scales.

Indexed as

Amyotrophic Lateral SclerosisDisease ProgressionDouble-Blind MethodEdaravoneFemaleHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMiddle AgedNeuroprotective AgentsTime FactorsEdaravoneNeuroprotective Agents

Identifiers

PMID33109706
PMCPMC7841496
OpenAlexW3095162650

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.