ArticleBMJ case reports2020
Radiological diagnostic dilemma in a child with small aggressive facial mass, time to increase the differentials: an inflammatory myofibroblastic tumour.
Article in BMJ case reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A 5-year-old girl with left facial swelling in the medial maxillary region close to the nasal ala was brought by her parents to our head and neck clinic. They have visited other doctors for similar presentation in the last 6 months, which started as redness and swelling, with occasional epiphora. The redness resolved after medical treatment, with slight regression of swelling, although it did not disappear. CT and MRI showed a locally aggressive, small enhancing soft tissue mass involving the left anteromedial maxillary wall, the nasal bone and the orbital floor. The mass involved the bony course of the nasolacrimal duct, which was the aetiology of the epiphora. The head and neck team performed an incisional biopsy through a sublabial approach. Concurrently, a nasolacrimal duct stent was inserted by an ophthalmologist. Histopathology was consistent with inflammatory myofibroblastic tumour with positive stains for CD68, CD163 and anaplastic lymphoma kinase-1. The tumour was excised and presently the patient is on periodic follow-up with head and neck and ophthalmology clinics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.