ArticleBMJ open2020
Identifying heterogeneity in the risk factors of dental caries status in Chinese adolescents using Poisson mixture regression.
Article in BMJ open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Subgroup detection-based dental caries status and inequalities trend exploration: A nationwide, 10-year-repeated cross-sectional study.Frontiers in public health · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe purpose of this study was to cluster individuals into groups with different dental health characteristics and make statistical inferences on the effect differences among different groups simultaneously to identify the heterogeneity of risk factors in Chinese adolescents by analysing the data from the 4th Chinese National Oral Health Survey.
methodsFor decayed, missing and filled permanent teeth (DMFT), mean values were statistically analysed for their relationships with different categories of all involved variables. As DMFT scores only have discrete values, Poisson mixture regression was adopted to model the heterogeneity and complex patterns in the association and to detect the subgroup. The Bayesian information criterion (BIC) was used to determine the optimal number of subgroups. A series of Wald tests were used to explore the relationship between risk factors including the interaction effects and the number of DMFT.
resultsA total of 100 986 individuals aged 12-15 years old were analysed. The model clustered different individuals into three subgroups and built three submodels for detailed statistical inference simultaneously. The number of individuals in the three subgroups were 52 576 (52.1%), 41 969 (41.5%) and 6441 (6.4%), respectively. The mean (SD) of DMFT of the three subgroups was 0.50 (1.05), 0.99 (1.21), 5.59 (2.50). The model fitting results indicated that the effects of all risk factors on DMFT appear to be different in three subgroups. Controlling the confounding effects, our analysis implied that the regional inequality was the main contributing factor to dental caries among adolescents in Chinese mainland.
conclusionsThe risk factors of dental caries exhibited heterogeneity in groups with different characteristics. The Poisson mixture regression model could cluster individuals into groups and identify the heterogeneous effects of risk factors among different groups. The findings support the need for different targeted interventions and prevention measures in groups with different dental health characteristics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.