Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33109657›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2020

Resilience in Healthcare (RiH): a longitudinal research programme protocol.

Karina Aase, Veslemøy Guise, Stephen Billett, Stephen Johan Mikal Sollid, Ove Njå, Olav Røise, Tanja Manser, Janet E Anderson, Siri Wiig

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
11.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. A Resilience Framework for Research in Oncology Massage Therapy.International journal of therapeutic massage & bodywork · 2025
    Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 7 institutions in 5 countries.

Karina AaseSHARE - Centre for Resilience in Healthcare, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway karina.aase@uis.no.ORCID 0000-0002-5363-5152
Veslemøy GuiseSHARE - Centre for Resilience in Healthcare, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-9124-1664
Stephen BillettSchool of Education and Professional Studies, Griffith University, Nathan, Queensland, Australia.
Stephen Johan Mikal SollidSHARE - Centre for Resilience in Healthcare, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway.
Ove NjåFaculty of Science and Technology, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway.
Olav RøiseSHARE - Centre for Resilience in Healthcare, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway.ORCID 0000-0003-4931-7001
Tanja ManserSchool of Applied Psychology, University of Applied Sciences and Arts Northwestern Switzerland, Olten, Switzerland.
Janet E AndersonSHARE - Centre for Resilience in Healthcare, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway.
Siri WiigSHARE - Centre for Resilience in Healthcare, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway.
Centre for Sustainable Healthcare · GBFHNW University of Applied Sciences and Arts · CHGriffith University · AUKing's College London · GBOslo University Hospital · NOStiftelsen Norsk Luftambulanse · NOUniversity of Stavanger · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionOver the past three decades, extensive research has been undertaken to understand the elements of what constitutes high quality in healthcare. Yet, much of this research has been conducted on individual elements and their specific challenges. Hence, goals other than understanding the complex of factors and elements that comprises quality in healthcare have been privileged. This lack of progress has led to the conclusion that existing approaches to research are not able to address the inherent complexity of healthcare systems as characterised by a significant degree of performance variability within and across system levels, and what makes them resilient. A shift is, therefore, necessary in such approaches. Resilience in Healthcare (RiH) adopts an approach comprising a comprehensive research programme that models the capacity of healthcare systems and stakeholders to adapt to changes, variations and/or disruptions: that is, resilience. As such, RiH offers a fresh approach capable of capturing and illuminating the complexity of healthcare and how high-quality care can be understood and advanced. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Methodologically, to illuminate what constitutes quality in healthcare, it is necessary to go beyond single-site, case-based studies. Instead, there is a need to engage in multi-site, cross-national studies and engage in long-term multidisciplinary collaboration between national and international researchers interacting with multiple healthcare stakeholders. By adopting such processes, multiple partners and a multidisciplinary orientation, the 5-year RiH research programme aims to confront these challenges and accelerate current understandings about and approaches to researching healthcare quality.The RiH research programme adopts a longitudinal collaborative interactive design to capture and illuminate resilience as part of healthcare quality in different healthcare settings in Norway and in five other countries. It combines a meta-analysis of detailed empirical research in Norway with cross-country comparison from Australia, Japan, Netherlands, Switzerland and the UK. Through establishing an RiH framework, the programme will identify processes with outcomes that aim to capture how high-quality healthcare provisions are achieved. A collaborative learning framework centred on engagement aims to systematically translate research findings into practice through co-construction processes with partners and stakeholders. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The RiH research programme is approved by the Norwegian Centre for Research Data (No. 864334). The empirical projects selected for inclusion in this longitudinal research programme have been approved by the Norwegian Centre for Research Data or the Regional Committees for Medical and Health Research Ethics. The RiH research programme has an embedded publication and dissemination strategy focusing on the progressive sharing of scientific knowledge, information and results, and on engaging with the public, including relevant patient and stakeholder representatives. The findings will be disseminated through scientific articles, PhD dissertations, presentations at national and international conferences, and through social media, newsletters and the popular media.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health CareHealth Services ResearchAustraliaHumansJapanLongitudinal StudiesNetherlandsNorwayQuality of Health CareSwitzerlandhealth policyhealth & safetyorganisation of health servicesquality in health care

Identifiers

PMID33109657
PMCPMC7592282
OpenAlexW3095128409

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.