ArticleeNeuro
Complementary Effects of Adaptation and Gain Control on Sound Encoding in Primary Auditory Cortex.
Article in eNeuro. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Multiparametric Classification of Pure-tone Responses Distinguishes Neurons in Inferior Colliculus Subdivisions.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Temporal recurrence as a general mechanism to explain neural responses in the auditory system.Communications biology · 2025Article
- Interference of Mid-level Speech and Noise Statistics Underlies Human Speech Recognition Sensitivity in Natural Environmental Noise.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025Article
- Short-term neuronal and synaptic plasticity act in synergy for deviance detection in spiking networks.PLoS computational biology · 2023Article
- A convolutional neural network provides a generalizable model of natural sound coding by neural populations in auditory cortex.PLoS computational biology · 2023Article
- Quantitative models of auditory cortical processing.Hearing research · 2023Review
- Deep neural networks effectively model neural adaptation to changing background noise and suggest nonlinear noise filtering methods in auditory cortex.NeuroImage · 2023Article
- Targeted dimensionality reduction enables reliable estimation of neural population coding accuracy from trial-limited data.PloS one · 2022Article
- Hearing in Complex Environments: Auditory Gain Control, Attention, and Hearing Loss.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2022Review
- Neuronal selectivity to complex vocalization features emerges in the superficial layers of primary auditory cortex.PLoS biology · 2021Article
- Disturbed Balance of Inhibitory Signaling Links Hearing Loss and Cognition.Frontiers in neural circuits · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
An important step toward understanding how the brain represents complex natural sounds is to develop accurate models of auditory coding by single neurons. A commonly used model is the linear-nonlinear spectro-temporal receptive field (STRF; LN model). The LN model accounts for many features of auditory tuning, but it cannot account for long-lasting effects of sensory context on sound-evoked activity. Two mechanisms that may support these contextual effects are short-term plasticity (STP) and contrast-dependent gain control (GC), which have inspired expanded versions of the LN model. Both models improve performance over the LN model, but they have never been compared directly. Thus, it is unclear whether they account for distinct processes or describe one phenomenon in different ways. To address this question, we recorded activity of neurons in primary auditory cortex (A1) of awake ferrets during presentation of natural sounds. We then fit models incorporating one nonlinear mechanism (GC or STP) or both (GC+STP) using this single dataset, and measured the correlation between the models' predictions and the recorded neural activity. Both the STP and GC models performed significantly better than the LN model, but the GC+STP model outperformed both individual models. We also quantified the equivalence of STP and GC model predictions and found only modest similarity. Consistent results were observed for a dataset collected in clean and noisy acoustic contexts. These results establish general methods for evaluating the equivalence of arbitrarily complex encoding models and suggest that the STP and GC models describe complementary processes in the auditory system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.