Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33109243›Full record

ArticleJournal of ethnobiology and ethnomedicine2020

Ethnobotanical survey of the medicinal flora of Harighal, Azad Jammu & Kashmir, Pakistan.

Muhammad Shoaib Amjad, Ujala Zahoor, Rainer W Bussmann, Muhammad Altaf, Syed Mubashar Hussain Gardazi, Arshad Mehmood Abbasi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of ethnobiology and ethnomedicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Unlocking the therapeutic potential ofSouth African journal of botany : official journal of the South African Association of Botanists = Suid-Afrikaanse tydskrif vir plantkunde : amptelike tydskrif van die Suid-Afrikaanse Genootskap van Plantkundiges · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. IntegrativeFrontiers in pharmacology · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Standard medical ethnobotany of Kohistan, North Pakistan.Journal of ethnobiology and ethnomedicine · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Update on the Potential ofAdvances in pharmacological and pharmaceutical sciences · 2024
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Muhammad Shoaib AmjadDepartment of Botany, Women University of Azad Jammu & Kashmir, Bagh, 12500, Pakistan. malikshoaib1165@yahoo.com.
Ujala ZahoorDepartment of Botany, Women University of Azad Jammu & Kashmir, Bagh, 12500, Pakistan.
Rainer W BussmannDepartment of Ethnobotany, Institute of Botany, Ilia State University, Tbilisi, Georgia.
Muhammad AltafDepartment of Zoology, Women University of Azad Jammu & Kashmir, Bagh, 12500, Pakistan.
Syed Mubashar Hussain GardaziDepartment of Botany, Women University of Azad Jammu & Kashmir, Bagh, 12500, Pakistan.
Arshad Mehmood AbbasiDepartment of Environmental Sciences, COMSATS University Islamabad, Abbottabad Campus, Abbottabad, 22060, Pakistan. arshad799@yahoo.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe present study is the first quantitative ethnobotanical evaluation of Harighal, an inaccessible and unexplored area of District Bagh Azad Jammu & Kashmir (AJK). The exploration, quantification, and comparison of ethnobotanical knowledge among different rural communities of the study area were mainly focused during field survey. METHODOLOGY: In total, 79 informants (49 men and 34 women) were selected randomly to collect data using a semi-structured questionnaire. Various quantitative indices, including use value, relative frequency of citation, relative importance, fidelity level, and informant consent factor, were employed to evaluate the gathered information. Furthermore, primary data were also compared with twenty-two papers published from adjoining areas.

resultA total of 150 medicinal plants belonging to 98 genera and 60 families were documented. Asteraceae, Fabaceae, and Rosaceae were the dominant families having 15 species each. Of these, 76 species were indigenous, 74 exotic, 136 were collected in the wild, 10 cultivated, and 4 both wild-collected and cultivated. Herbaceous taxa were the most used life form, and leaves were the most exploited plant part. Decoctions were the most preferred method used in preparation of herbal recipes. Three species viz. Mentha longifolia, Berberis lycium, and Galium aparine had the highest use value (1.05), relative frequency of citation (0.81), and relative importance value (96), respectively. The highest informant consensus factor (ICF) was reported for digestive disorders. Mentha longifolia, Punica granatum, Zanthoxylum alatum, and Olea ferruginea had 100% fidelity values. The Jaccard index revealed that uses of plants were more similar in two neighboring areas, i.e., Pearl Valley and Toli Peer.

conclusionLocal inhabitants still prioritize herbal medicines as an effective way to treat a wide variety of ailments. Elders and health practitioners of the study area are well aware of indigenous knowledge about medicinal plants, but young people are not much interested in herbal practices. Thus, valuable knowledge about the use of plants is on the verge of decline.

Indexed as

EthnobotanyKnowledgeAdultAgedAged, 80 and overEthnopharmacologyFemaleHumansMaleMedicine, TraditionalMiddle AgedPakistanPlant LeavesPlant PreparationsPlants, MedicinalRural PopulationPlant PreparationsAzad Jammu & KashmirEthnobotanyFidelity levelMedicinal floraPakistanUsed value

Identifiers

PMID33109243
PMCPMC7590686

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.